From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4102BC7EE22 for ; Mon, 8 May 2023 19:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.531816.827793 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pw6ps-00011T-4V; Mon, 08 May 2023 19:47:52 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 531816.827793; Mon, 08 May 2023 19:47:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pw6pr-0000zA-K3; Mon, 08 May 2023 19:47:51 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 531816; Mon, 08 May 2023 19:47:49 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-sth1-in.inumbo.com ([159.253.27.254] helo=se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pw6m4-0004GB-CO for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 19:43:56 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (galois.linutronix.de [2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id aaa15205-edd8-11ed-b226-6b7b168915f2; Mon, 08 May 2023 21:43:55 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: aaa15205-edd8-11ed-b226-6b7b168915f2 Message-ID: <20230508185218.183895955@linutronix.de> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1683575034; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: references:references; bh=JFZgPCXfk4YqrkWgB2iOW/w2n4X/0HLpXczGoD+v1Vc=; b=dUhrJJpkQ4m0PAJlXgFQayguIDRYj4DbGKW+17HOquchCD5OkCNG5p+ivglj6Zp0QU+I0O sjDl2ZSA2qdGYXZhUvFPnbPFXnAtHugvx2GI+wQbJ19qs9tz5O+rWnDYC86GVW88KAAeKE Y1tCVHUnxg/G/GD2y2S3k8oy8xdR5u5wsZrKD02jMrshweqjIs0USPtzbNHtBjzyPjuZYP bnHk9lUQIZYMlOyOmAOBq9jij07nAxoPfgUgAqbfHUg2W+wm48VsfVgoz2u1VnDCsiAyNh 0QgIUd501thJfEkajmTlocFpAZEG7qATCMndUXAIFuG7nTRHlZ0qw32Bk/xexg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1683575034; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: references:references; bh=JFZgPCXfk4YqrkWgB2iOW/w2n4X/0HLpXczGoD+v1Vc=; b=w6a2Le7411PlZc47ukf/lNrWYBsIfR8a67l/rnpzfLfXCU2HTbN7zdy8QxM7z6Q1BG3dst HEreuKgJSAkc7vCQ== From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: x86@kernel.org, David Woodhouse , Andrew Cooper , Brian Gerst , Arjan van de Veen , Paolo Bonzini , Paul McKenney , Tom Lendacky , Sean Christopherson , Oleksandr Natalenko , Paul Menzel , "Guilherme G. Piccoli" , Piotr Gorski , Usama Arif , Juergen Gross , Boris Ostrovsky , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Guo Ren , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Sabin Rapan , "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" Subject: [patch v3 17/36] x86/xen/hvm: Get rid of DEAD_FROZEN handling References: <20230508181633.089804905@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 21:43:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner No point in this conditional voodoo. Un-initializing the lock mechanism is safe to be called unconditionally even if it was already invoked when the CPU died. Remove the invocation of xen_smp_intr_free() as that has been already cleaned up in xen_cpu_dead_hvm(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Michael Kelley --- arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c @@ -161,13 +161,12 @@ static int xen_cpu_up_prepare_hvm(unsign int rc = 0; /* - * This can happen if CPU was offlined earlier and - * offlining timed out in common_cpu_die(). + * If a CPU was offlined earlier and offlining timed out then the + * lock mechanism is still initialized. Uninit it unconditionally + * as it's safe to call even if already uninited. Interrupts and + * timer have already been handled in xen_cpu_dead_hvm(). */ - if (cpu_report_state(cpu) == CPU_DEAD_FROZEN) { - xen_smp_intr_free(cpu); - xen_uninit_lock_cpu(cpu); - } + xen_uninit_lock_cpu(cpu); if (cpu_acpi_id(cpu) != U32_MAX) per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, cpu) = cpu_acpi_id(cpu);