On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 11:54 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote: > Hi, > Hello, > I see a problem with destroy and restart of a domain. Interrupts are > not > available when trying to restart a domain. > > The situation seems very similar to the thread "null scheduler bug" > > https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2018-09/msg01213.html > . > Right. Back then, PCI passthrough was involved, if I remember correctly. Is it the case for you as well? > The target system is a iMX8-based ARM board and Xen is a 4.13.0 > version > built from https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/imx-xen.git. > Mmm, perhaps it's me, but neither going at that url with a browser not trying to clone it, I do not see anything. What I'm doing wrong? > Xen is booted with sched=null vwfi=native. > One physical CPU core is pinned to the domu. > Some interrupts are passed through to the domu. > Ok, I guess it is involved, since you say "some interrupts are passed through..." > When destroying the domain with xl destroy etc it does not complain > but > then when trying to restart the domain > again with a "xl create " I get: > (XEN) IRQ 210 is already used by domain 1 > > "xl list" does not contain the domain. > > Repeating the "xl create" command 5-10 times eventually starts the > domain without complaining about the IRQ. > > Inspired from the discussion in the thread above I have put printks > in > the xen/common/domain.c file. > In the function domain_destroy I have a printk("End of domain_destroy > function\n") in the end. > In the function complete_domain_destroy have a printk("Begin of > complete_domain_destroy function\n") in the beginning. > > With these printouts I get at "xl destroy": > (XEN) End of domain_destroy function > > So it seems like the function complete_domain_destroy is not called. > Ok, thanks for making these tests. It's helpful to have this information right away. > "xl create" results in: > (XEN) IRQ 210 is already used by domain 1 > (XEN) End of domain_destroy function > > Then repeated "xl create" looks the same until after a few tries I > also get: > (XEN) Begin of complete_domain_destroy function > > After that the next "xl create" creates the domain. > > > I have also applied the patch from > > https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2018-09/msg02469.html > . > This does seem to change the results. > Ah... Really? That's a bit unexpected, TBH. Well, I'll think about it. > Starting the system without "sched=null vwfi=native" does not result > in > the problem. > Ok, how about, if you're up for some more testing: - booting with "sched=null" but not with "vwfi=native" - booting with "sched=null vwfi=native" but not doing the IRQ  passthrough that you mentioned above ? Regards -- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D http://about.me/dario.faggioli Virtualization Software Engineer SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- <> (Raistlin Majere)