xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
To: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	David Scott <dave.scott@eu.citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [v11][PATCH 09/16] tools: extend xc_assign_device() to support rdm reservation policy
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:06:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21935.38246.446842.418001@mariner.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437528607-19315-10-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>

Tiejun Chen writes ("[v11][PATCH 09/16] tools: extend xc_assign_device() to support rdm reservation policy"):
> This patch passes rdm reservation policy to xc_assign_device() so the policy
> is checked when assigning devices to a VM.

Wei, as you know, I am double-checking the acks on this series.

You acked v4.  But v11 is slightly different.  Your ack was retained
and my subject line search did not turn up any authority for that.

The v* message by the submitter says:

> v5:
> 
> * Fix the flag field as "0" to DT device

Below is the diff between
  * staging (bc299d01) + Jan's v12 + v11 02.. + the relevant patch from v4
  * staging (bc299d01) + Jan's v12 + v11 02.. + the relevant patch from v8

Please ack/nack.

Thanks,
Ian.

diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_domain.c b/tools/libxc/xc_domain.c
index 1dfadb0..69e6d8f 100644
--- a/tools/libxc/xc_domain.c
+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_domain.c
@@ -1794,8 +1794,11 @@ int xc_assign_dt_device(
 
     domctl.u.assign_device.dev = XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_DT;
     domctl.u.assign_device.u.dt.size = size;
-    /* DT doesn't own any RDM. */
-    domctl.u.assign_device.flag = XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_NO_RDM;
+    /*
+     * DT doesn't own any RDM so actually DT has nothing to do
+     * for any flag and here just fix that as 0.
+     */
+    domctl.u.assign_device.flag = 0;
     set_xen_guest_handle(domctl.u.assign_device.u.dt.path, path);
 
     rc = do_domctl(xch, &domctl);
diff --git a/tools/ocaml/libs/xc/xenctrl_stubs.c b/tools/ocaml/libs/xc/xenctrl_stubs.c
index 317bf75..b7de615 100644
--- a/tools/ocaml/libs/xc/xenctrl_stubs.c
+++ b/tools/ocaml/libs/xc/xenctrl_stubs.c
@@ -1173,9 +1173,7 @@ CAMLprim value stub_xc_domain_test_assign_device(value xch, value domid, value d
 }
 
 static int domain_assign_device_rdm_flag_table[] = {
-    XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_NO_RDM,
     XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_RELAXED,
-    XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_STRICT,
 };
 
 CAMLprim value stub_xc_domain_assign_device(value xch, value domid, value desc,
diff --git a/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c b/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c
index ff4adb3..c8380d1 100644
--- a/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c
+++ b/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c
@@ -615,7 +615,8 @@ static int next_bdf(char **str, int *seg, int *bus, int *dev, int *func,
     }
     else
     {
-        *flag = XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_STRICT;
+        /* O means we take "strict" as our default policy. */
+        *flag = 0;
         *str = NULL;
     }

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-22 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-22  1:29 [v11][PATCH 00/16] Fix RMRR Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  1:29 ` [v11][PATCH 01/16] xen: introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  9:32   ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-22 10:42   ` [PATCH v12] " Jan Beulich
2015-07-22 12:17     ` Julien Grall
2015-07-22 12:28       ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-22 12:52     ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-22 13:14       ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-22 13:19         ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-22 12:55     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-22 13:03       ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-22 13:20         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-22 13:28           ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-22 13:46     ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-22 14:22     ` [PATCH v12a] " Jan Beulich
2015-07-22  1:29 ` [v11][PATCH 02/16] xen/vtd: create RMRR mapping Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  1:29 ` [v11][PATCH 03/16] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  1:29 ` [v11][PATCH 04/16] xen: enable XENMEM_memory_map in hvm Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  1:29 ` [v11][PATCH 05/16] hvmloader: get guest memory map into memory_map[] Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  1:29 ` [v11][PATCH 06/16] hvmloader/pci: Try to avoid placing BARs in RMRRs Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  8:43   ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-22 13:00   ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-22  1:29 ` [v11][PATCH 07/16] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  1:29 ` [v11][PATCH 08/16] tools/libxc: Expose new hypercall xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  1:30 ` [v11][PATCH 09/16] tools: extend xc_assign_device() to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22 13:06   ` Ian Jackson [this message]
2015-07-22 15:01     ` Wei Liu
2015-07-22  1:30 ` [v11][PATCH 10/16] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  1:30 ` [v11][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  8:28   ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-22  8:52     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-22 10:12       ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-22 10:54       ` George Dunlap
2015-07-22 10:04   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-22 16:05     ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-22 13:24   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-22 13:33     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-22 14:04       ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-22 15:00         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-22 15:09           ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-22 15:09           ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-22 15:21             ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-22  1:30 ` [v11][PATCH 12/16] tools: introduce a new parameter to set a predefined rdm boundary Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  1:30 ` [v11][PATCH 13/16] libxl: construct e820 map with RDM information for HVM guest Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  1:30 ` [v11][PATCH 14/16] xen/vtd: enable USB device assignment Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  1:30 ` [v11][PATCH 15/16] xen/vtd: prevent from assign the device with shared rmrr Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22  1:30 ` [v11][PATCH 16/16] tools: parse to enable new rdm policy parameters Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22 14:09   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-22 14:40     ` Wei Liu
2015-07-22 12:38 ` [v11][PATCH 00/16] Fix RMRR Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21935.38246.446842.418001@mariner.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=dave.scott@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).