From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Jackson Subject: Re: patch ping Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:23:24 +0000 Message-ID: <22219.13820.299098.250580@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <56CB0E6F02000078000D4B4C@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aXtGi-0008DM-SJ for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:23:28 +0000 In-Reply-To: <56CB0E6F02000078000D4B4C@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Keir Fraser , Stefano Stabellini , Andrew Cooper , Tim Deegan , Ian Campbell , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Jan Beulich writes ("patch ping"): > REST maintainers, > > may I ask for an ack or otherwise for > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg01956.html > , which is basically a follow-up to the above (and will need [trivial] > re-basing before committing)? I see no problem with this patch. Acked-by: Ian Jackson