From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Cc: sstabellini@kernel.org, wei.liu2@citrix.com, steve.capper@arm.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Wei Chen <wei.chen@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for head.S Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:03:44 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <22358.39936.692242.613124@mariner.uk.xensource.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5755AE26.8020205@arm.com> Julien Grall writes ("Re: [RFC] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for head.S"): > On 03/06/16 11:07, Wei Chen wrote: > > When we update the header files that had been included in head.S. > > The build system would not re-compile the head.S. Because in the > > build rules, the dependencies are setting to .*.d (eg. DEPS = .*.d) > > files in the same folder as Makefile. > > > > But head.S is very special, it was used by the Makefile in the parent > > folder: "ALL_OBJS := $(TARGET_SUBARCH)/head.o". > > > > In this case, the build system could not find the dependency in DEPS. > > When we update the header files, the build system is unware of this > > update. If we re-build the Xen without doing make clean or touching > > the head.S, the build system will not recompile the head.S. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@linaro.org> Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> This should be in 4.7 and is a backport candidate. > > In my mind, the better way to fix this bug is converting the DEPS from > > ALL_OBJS. But I am afraid of the impact. I am not sure whether there > > are some dependencies are not generated from obj files. I do like this idea but I have the same worry. It might be possible to dump ALL_OBJS out somehow and check this, but it might be arch-dependent. Wei Chen's patch is IMO a straightforward fix. Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 10:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-06-03 10:07 Wei Chen 2016-06-06 17:08 ` Julien Grall 2016-06-07 10:03 ` Ian Jackson [this message] 2016-06-07 4:34 ` [RFC v2] " Wei Chen 2016-06-07 13:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2016-06-08 3:10 ` Wei Chen 2016-06-07 16:01 ` [RFC v2] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for head.S [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson 2016-06-07 16:24 ` Wei Liu 2016-06-08 3:14 ` Wei Chen 2016-06-08 8:09 ` Wei Liu 2016-06-07 10:07 ` [RFC] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for head.S Julien Grall
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=22358.39936.692242.613124@mariner.uk.xensource.com \ --to=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \ --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \ --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \ --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \ --cc=steve.capper@arm.com \ --cc=wei.chen@linaro.org \ --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \ --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \ --subject='Re: [RFC] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for head.S' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).