From: Ian Jackson <email@example.com> To: Wei Liu <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: Juergen Gross <email@example.com>, Dario Faggioli <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: correct xl cpupool-numa-split with vcpu limited dom0 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:07:31 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20160614095652.GE28116@citrix.com> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: correct xl cpupool-numa-split with vcpu limited dom0"): > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:01:50AM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 06:30 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > > > When trying to use xl cpupool-numa-split and dom0 is limited to less > > > vcpus than one numa node the operation will fail. > > > > > > Correct this by allowing this configuration. > > > > > > Reported-by: Glenn Enright <firstname.lastname@example.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <email@example.com> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Dario Faggioli <firstname.lastname@example.org> > > Acked-by: Wei Liu <email@example.com> > > I think this is also a backport candidate? Possibly. I looked at the code for a minute or two, and perhaps I'm being dense this morning, but I wasn't able to see (from the code and the commit message and from the diff) precisely what misunderstanding the original author of the code had, and how this patch fixes it. I don't want to backport (non-security) things unless they have a very low chance of regressions. So perhaps someone could either explain it to me, or assert convincingly that they are sure it's right :-). Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xenfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 10:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-06-14 4:30 Juergen Gross 2016-06-14 9:01 ` Dario Faggioli 2016-06-14 9:56 ` Wei Liu 2016-06-14 9:58 ` Wei Liu 2016-06-14 10:05 ` Juergen Gross 2016-06-17 10:44 ` Wei Liu 2016-06-14 10:07 ` Ian Jackson [this message] 2016-06-14 10:31 ` Juergen Gross 2016-06-14 14:28 ` Ian Jackson
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] libxl: correct xl cpupool-numa-split with vcpu limited dom0' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).