Re: xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

[Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>]

David Vrabel writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"):
> On 20/06/16 18:03, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Hopefully we can find one that Andrew likes and that's acceptable to
> > the committers.
> > 
> > I suggest
> >   xen-microvm-test-framework
> >   xen-microvm-test-suite
> >   xtf-microvm-suite
> 
> "xtf"

iwj@xenbits:~$ ls ~xen/git
kemari                         qemu-xen-4.1-testing.git
libvirt.git                    qemu-xen-4.2-testing.git
linux-2.6-xen.git              qemu-xen-4.3-testing.git
linux-pvops.git                qemu-xen-4.4-testing.git
livepatch-build-tools.git      qemu-xen-4.5-testing.git
mini-os.git                    qemu-xen-4.6-testing.git
osstest                        qemu-xen.git
osstest.git                    qemu-xen-traditional.git
ovmf.git                       qemu-xen-unstable.git
people                         raisin.git
pvdrivers                      rumpuser-xen.git
qemu-upstream-4.2-testing.git  seabios.git
qemu-upstream-4.3-testing.git  staging
qemu-upstream-4.4-testing.git  xcp
qemu-upstream-4.5-testing.git  xenalyze.git
qemu-upstream-4.6-testing.git  xenclient
qemu-upstream-unstable.git     xen.git
qemu-xen-3.3-testing.git       xen.git-aside
qemu-xen-3.4-testing.git       xenrt-citrix
qemu-xen-4.0-testing.git       xentesttools
iwj@xenbits:~$

> It seems unfair to give Andrew's project a clunky (repo) name because
> osstest is not sufficiently discoverable.

Is that a complaint that it's too long ?

I could live with "xtf", although I think it's rather too short.

Lars, can you please advise what process we need to use to come to
closure on this decision ?

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel