From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F206C433E0 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0B7B20644 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:52:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F0B7B20644 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkqTQ-000469-FR; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:52:32 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkqTP-00045x-0r for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:52:31 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: d5f1254c-af17-11ea-8496-bc764e2007e4 Received: from esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.145.155]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id d5f1254c-af17-11ea-8496-bc764e2007e4; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none IronPort-SDR: u7vFcgU0ZecUN9Y+nU75qkrK6QsHvMYHBHG02UDxLpDm/8PY7vLhfQHCaKFyzsnCEn0dfPcLJ0 v6vuDqkxTss84ZR8uhu3sLB91jgyqzCwXeBQN7H0TeWkPrCYCAqr9ISuFvA60Wgh9KuqQcpMyU rri4OV2+ELAxdZ7dUCkHzm8WkKjuBQpgl3Tx1AG26rU3BmAKJ6ZMl8ol5/x9Ucnfcq7BOTB3FY x5Th+XAi96+WGGrowGc6nStmipmP0esBz5ZKsy8y8n2LtdEGR1ON2U5cgEsM9Zfxpw055WDyNM ilU= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 20069067 X-Ironport-Server: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,514,1583211600"; d="scan'208";a="20069067" From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24295.35624.644030.417783@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:52:24 +0100 To: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] tests/cpu-policy: Confirm that CPUID serialisation is sorted In-Reply-To: <20200615141532.1927-3-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> References: <20200615141532.1927-1-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <20200615141532.1927-3-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Xen-devel , Paul Durrant , Wei Liu , Jan Beulich , Roger Pau Monne Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" Andrew Cooper writes ("[PATCH 2/9] tests/cpu-policy: Confirm that CPUID serialisation is sorted"): > The existing x86_cpuid_copy_to_buffer() does produce sorted results, and we're > about to start relying on this. Extend the unit tests. > > As test_cpuid_serialise_success() is a fairly limited set of synthetic > examples right now, introduce test_cpuid_current() to operate on the full > policy for the current CPU. > > Tweak the fail() macro to allow for simplified control flow. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper Acked-by: Ian Jackson I don't think anything in our normal dev workflow runs this automatically ? Maybe this would be something for us to think about... Ian.