From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8D5C433F5 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8126860D42 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:03:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 8126860D42 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenproject.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.207345.363137 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1maJJb-0000RD-QA; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:03:39 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 207345.363137; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:03:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1maJJb-0000R6-NK; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:03:39 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 207345; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:03:38 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1maJJa-0000R0-1Y for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:03:38 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1maJJZ-0003O0-Vx for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:03:37 +0000 Received: from iwj (helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1maJJZ-0002VP-Uq for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:03:37 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1maJJW-0004eJ-Ir; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:03:34 +0100 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:Date :Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From; bh=FOYoEW8KI7o4uzQlqUDJZjWTqq3iruwDf0kf/sUVJRw=; b=UuEQirFJ8k3Q5ZR5n2ne+qz5/C bzjd0xLE92nDIHRMwdZtl4Juk8tnKkJVDJzwgAxnXuFkvgERn+bog2FPVLXN8hfunUxP2v0ZagTvE R4JiwX/ABWJGyHxYGnW2brjI3z6TQ0yF6yRixfH1kxq6o5M9GxD+4LWpSNZ+tgOASSOY=; From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24933.41926.168289.698356@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:03:34 +0100 To: Rahul Singh Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, bertrand.marquis@arm.com, Andre.Przywara@arm.com, Wei Liu , Anthony PERARD , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Julien Grall , Volodymyr Babchuk Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl Newsgroups: chiark.mail.xen.devel In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Rahul Singh writes ("[PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl"): > libxl will create an emulated PCI device tree node in the device tree to > enable the guest OS to discover the virtual PCI during guest boot. > Emulated PCI device tree node will only be created when there is any > device assigned to guest. > > A new area has been reserved in the arm guest physical map at > which the VPCI bus is declared in the device tree (reg and ranges > parameters of the node). I think this series is targeted for 4.16. Stefano drew this patch to my attention. I have read the thread on this patch and it is not clear to me that it has converged. Code freeze is imminent. Is there some way I can help here ? Ian.