From: Ian Jackson <iwj@xenproject.org>
To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Christian Lindig <christian.lindig@citrix.com>,
David Scott <dave@recoil.org>,
Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.16 v6] gnttab: allow setting max version per-domain
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:11:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24969.15915.743915.85438@mariner.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24963.52367.786659.412345@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
I have collected the acks and pushed these.
While doing so I found this in the thread:
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.16 v6] gnttab: allow setting max version per-domain"):
> Roger Pau Monne writes ("[PATCH for-4.16 v6] gnttab: allow setting max version per-domain"):
> > NB: the stubdom max grant version is cloned from the domain one. Not
> > sure whether long term we might want to use different options for the
> > stubdom and the domain. In any case the attack surface will always be
> > max(stubdom, domain), so maybe it's just pointless to allow more fine
> > grained settings.
>
> ^ I think maybe this should go into a comment or commit message or
> something, not just a tail note ?
Maybe this should go into a code comment ?
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-08 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-04 10:48 [PATCH for-4.16 v6] gnttab: allow setting max version per-domain Roger Pau Monne
2021-11-04 11:00 ` Christian Lindig
2021-11-04 12:05 ` Ian Jackson
2021-11-08 15:11 ` Ian Jackson [this message]
2021-11-04 12:09 ` Ian Jackson
2021-11-04 12:25 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-04 13:48 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-11-08 14:46 ` Ian Jackson
2021-11-08 14:54 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-11-04 12:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-11-08 15:00 ` Ian Jackson
2021-11-08 15:07 ` Roger Pau Monné
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24969.15915.743915.85438@mariner.uk.xensource.com \
--to=iwj@xenproject.org \
--cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=christian.lindig@citrix.com \
--cc=dave@recoil.org \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).