xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/11] x86/intel_pstate: avoid calling cpufreq_add_cpu() twice
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:35:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F79E432F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55B25B570200007800095344@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On 24/07/2015 21:36,  Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.06.15 at 13:15, <wei.w.wang@intel.com> wrote:
> > cpufreq_add_cpu() is already called in the hypercall code path (the
> > bottom of set_px_pminfo() and inside cpufreq_cpu_init()).
> > So, we remove the redundant calling here.
> 
> While I can see that currently the call is kind of pointless (as it can't do
> anything useful before Dom0 communicated the data obtained from ACPI),
> it's still logically correct to call the callback on the BP prior to registering a hook
> for AP bringup. Otherwise you could (and perhaps should) as well defer the
> CPU notifier registration.
> 
> Otoh now that you're trying to introduce a driver independent of ACPI (and
> hence initialized at boot time) I wonder why you don't make use of what is
> here instead of deleting it.
> 

Ok, I will roll back to leave cpufreq_presmp_init() there.

Best,
Wei
> 
> > --- a/xen/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -632,8 +632,6 @@ static struct notifier_block cpu_nfb = {
> >
> >  static int __init cpufreq_presmp_init(void)  {
> > -    void *cpu = (void *)(long)smp_processor_id();
> > -    cpu_callback(&cpu_nfb, CPU_ONLINE, cpu);
> >      register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_nfb);
> >      return 0;
> >  }
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2015-07-27  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-25 11:15 [PATCH v4 04/11] x86/intel_pstate: avoid calling cpufreq_add_cpu() twice Wei Wang
2015-07-24 13:35 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-27  7:35   ` Wang, Wei W [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F79E432F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).