From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] x86: fixes/improvements for scratch cpumask
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:13:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <287b5277-c6fc-3444-5c6a-6099cd754c2b@eikelenboom.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200212170150.GS4679@Air-de-Roger>
On 12/02/2020 18:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 05:53:39PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 12/02/2020 17:49, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Commit:
>>>
>>> 5500d265a2a8fa63d60c08beb549de8ec82ff7a5
>>> x86/smp: use APIC ALLBUT destination shorthand when possible
>>>
>>> Introduced a bogus usage of the scratch cpumask: it was used in a
>>> function that could be called from interrupt context, and hence using
>>> the scratch cpumask there is not safe. Patch #2 is a fix for that usage.
>>>
>>> Patch #3 adds some debug infrastructure to make sure the scratch cpumask
>>> is used in the right context, and hence should prevent further missuses.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Roger.
>>
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>> Do you still want me to test the "panic" patch ?
>> Or test this series instead ?
>
> I've been able to trigger this myself, so if you can give a try to the
> series in order to assert it fixes your issue that would be great.
>
> Thanks.
>
Sure, compiling now, will report back tomorrow morning.
--
Sander
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-12 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-12 16:49 [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] x86: fixes/improvements for scratch cpumask Roger Pau Monne
2020-02-12 16:49 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86/smp: unify header includes in smp.h Roger Pau Monne
2020-02-12 23:05 ` Wei Liu
2020-02-13 9:54 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-12 16:49 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86/smp: use a dedicated scratch cpumask in send_IPI_mask Roger Pau Monne
2020-02-13 9:59 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-13 10:03 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-02-13 10:19 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-13 11:41 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-02-13 13:35 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-12 16:49 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86: add accessors for scratch cpu mask Roger Pau Monne
2020-02-13 10:12 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-13 15:15 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-02-13 15:43 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-12 16:53 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] x86: fixes/improvements for scratch cpumask Sander Eikelenboom
2020-02-12 17:01 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-02-12 17:13 ` Sander Eikelenboom [this message]
2020-02-13 9:31 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2020-02-12 21:05 ` Julien Grall
2020-02-13 9:53 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-13 10:05 ` Roger Pau Monné
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=287b5277-c6fc-3444-5c6a-6099cd754c2b@eikelenboom.it \
--to=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).