xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rahul Singh <Rahul.Singh@arm.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	"Bertrand Marquis" <Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>,
	"George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	"Ian Jackson" <iwj@xenproject.org>,
	"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	"Paul Durrant" <paul@xen.org>,
	"Volodymyr Babchuk" <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
	"Daniel De Graaf" <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen/pci: Refactor PCI MSI interrupts related code
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:07:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30D00B1B-ECB9-4A5B-ACBD-37E532285CCD@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a1beaee4-0d6b-e38e-07f7-90a014c504b6@suse.com>

Hi Jan,

> On 20 Apr 2021, at 4:36 pm, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> 
> On 20.04.2021 15:45, Rahul Singh wrote:
>>> On 19 Apr 2021, at 1:33 pm, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>> On 19.04.2021 13:54, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>> For the time being, I think move this code in x86 is a lot better than 
>>>> #ifdef or keep the code in common code.
>>> 
>>> Well, I would perhaps agree if it ended up being #ifdef CONFIG_X86.
>>> I would perhaps not agree if there was a new CONFIG_* which other
>>> (future) arch-es could select if desired.
>> 
>> I agree with Julien moving the code to x86 file as currently it is referenced only in x86 code
>> and as of now we are not sure how other architecture will implement the Interrupt remapping
>> (via IOMMU or any other means).  
>> 
>> Let me know if you are ok with moving the code to x86.
> 
> I can't answer this with "yes" or "no" without knowing what the alternative
> would be. As said, if the alternative is CONFIG_X86 #ifdef-ary, then yes.
> If a separate CONFIG_* gets introduced (and selected by X86), then a
> separate file (getting built only when that new setting is y) would seem
> better to me.

I just made a quick patch. Please let me know if below patch is ok. I move the definition to  "passthrough/x86/iommu.c” file.

diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
index 705137f8be..199ce08612 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
@@ -1303,13 +1303,6 @@ static int __init setup_dump_pcidevs(void)
 }
 __initcall(setup_dump_pcidevs);
 
-int iommu_update_ire_from_msi(
-    struct msi_desc *msi_desc, struct msi_msg *msg)
-{
-    return iommu_intremap
-           ? iommu_call(&iommu_ops, update_ire_from_msi, msi_desc, msg) : 0;
-}
-
 static int iommu_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
     const struct domain_iommu *hd;
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
index b90bb31bfe..cf51dec564 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
@@ -340,6 +340,13 @@ bool arch_iommu_use_permitted(const struct domain *d)
             likely(!p2m_get_hostp2m(d)->global_logdirty));
 }
 
+int iommu_update_ire_from_msi(
+    struct msi_desc *msi_desc, struct msi_msg *msg)
+{
+    return iommu_intremap
+           ? iommu_call(&iommu_ops, update_ire_from_msi, msi_desc, msg) : 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Local variables:
  * mode: C
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/iommu.h b/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
index ea0cd0f1a2..bd42d87b72 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
@@ -243,7 +243,6 @@ struct iommu_ops {
                            u8 devfn, device_t *dev);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PCI
     int (*get_device_group_id)(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 devfn);
-    int (*update_ire_from_msi)(struct msi_desc *msi_desc, struct msi_msg *msg);
 #endif /* HAS_PCI */
 
     void (*teardown)(struct domain *d);
@@ -272,6 +271,7 @@ struct iommu_ops {
     int (*adjust_irq_affinities)(void);
     void (*sync_cache)(const void *addr, unsigned int size);
     void (*clear_root_pgtable)(struct domain *d);
+    int (*update_ire_from_msi)(struct msi_desc *msi_desc, struct msi_msg *msg);
 #endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
 
     int __must_check (*suspend)(void)

Regards,
Rahul
> 
> Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-21  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-09 16:00 [PATCH v2] xen/pci: Refactor PCI MSI interrupts related code Rahul Singh
2021-04-12 10:49 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-12 11:28   ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-12 18:26     ` Rahul Singh
2021-04-12 16:28   ` Rahul Singh
2021-04-13 17:12   ` Julien Grall
2021-04-14  7:08     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-14  8:28       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-14  8:47         ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-14  8:28       ` Julien Grall
2021-04-14  8:05     ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-14  8:49       ` Julien Grall
2021-04-15 13:26         ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-15 13:31           ` Julien Grall
2021-04-19  7:16             ` Rahul Singh
2021-04-19  8:40               ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-19 11:16                 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-19 11:54                   ` Julien Grall
2021-04-19 12:33                     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-20 13:45                       ` Rahul Singh
2021-04-20 15:36                         ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21  8:07                           ` Rahul Singh [this message]
2021-04-21  8:16                             ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21  9:15                               ` Rahul Singh
2021-04-21  9:33                                 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 11:55                                   ` Rahul Singh
2021-04-21  9:32                               ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21  9:01                             ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30D00B1B-ECB9-4A5B-ACBD-37E532285CCD@arm.com \
    --to=rahul.singh@arm.com \
    --cc=Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).