From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB234C433E0 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 15:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2018A650F0 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 15:33:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2018A650F0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.81805.151215 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l836u-0007hM-O6; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 15:33:28 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 81805.151215; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 15:33:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l836u-0007hF-Kc; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 15:33:28 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 81805; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 15:33:27 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l836t-0007hA-0D for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 15:33:27 +0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.15]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 9eaa72c3-a5f0-4921-b8ff-14bfe80b849b; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 15:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B947B126; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 15:33:24 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 9eaa72c3-a5f0-4921-b8ff-14bfe80b849b X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1612539204; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7WlWgN3tZhK/CGvAjLlD5+NGjUp7Ddd59Xa7JrvrAnM=; b=Q5Gaf1gn9crn2hf9kliRTUiuYXn41kNgkjvlWyZ7F8kIkzDfEupY1MX4gOfzgfjvQoEqLP +RyxH8w3knpfot6sYv1Ii8zFHzFgF/hPkXLb1cdy9DdazOtWEVegyGFuE9fKTQfvSjovzN kghdj7P+rtZiwI2HbkvN33pYDhR/t7o= Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Xen 4.15 - call for notification/status of significant bugs To: Ian Jackson Cc: Andrew Cooper , Dario Faggioli , Julien Grall , community.manager@xenproject.org, committers@xenproject.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org References: <24600.8030.769396.165224@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <24603.58528.901884.980466@mariner.uk.xensource.com> From: Jan Beulich Message-ID: <361da489-25a1-4a36-b917-9a092900b2e5@suse.com> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:33:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <24603.58528.901884.980466@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04.02.2021 13:12, Ian Jackson wrote: > Although there are a few things outstanding, we are now firmly into > the bugfixing phase of the Xen 4.15 release. > > I searched my email (and my memory) and found four open blockers which > I have listed below, and one closed blocker. > > I feel there are probably more issues out there, so please let me > know, in response to this mail, of any other significant bugs you are > aware of. > > Ian. > > > OPEN ISSUES > ----------- Roger has just pointed out to me that I should probably ask for "x86/time: calibration rendezvous adjustments" to also be tracked here. Though just to clarify - the bad behavior has been there for a (long) while, so this isn't like a recent regression. Jan