From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <iwj@xenproject.org>, Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/6] evtchn: type adjustments
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:17:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cb6de31-39e3-43ff-2a9f-a09aa1b1fc26@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <306e62e8-9070-2db9-c959-858465c50c1d@suse.com>
First of all avoid "long" when "int" suffices, i.e. in particular when
merely conveying error codes. 32-bit values are slightly cheaper to
deal with on x86, and their processing is at least no more expensive on
Arm. Where possible use evtchn_port_t for port numbers and unsigned int
for other unsigned quantities in adjacent code. In evtchn_set_priority()
eliminate a local variable altogether instead of changing its type.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
---
v4: New.
--- a/xen/common/event_channel.c
+++ b/xen/common/event_channel.c
@@ -287,13 +287,12 @@ void evtchn_free(struct domain *d, struc
xsm_evtchn_close_post(chn);
}
-static long evtchn_alloc_unbound(evtchn_alloc_unbound_t *alloc)
+static int evtchn_alloc_unbound(evtchn_alloc_unbound_t *alloc)
{
struct evtchn *chn;
struct domain *d;
- int port;
+ int port, rc;
domid_t dom = alloc->dom;
- long rc;
d = rcu_lock_domain_by_any_id(dom);
if ( d == NULL )
@@ -346,13 +345,13 @@ static void double_evtchn_unlock(struct
evtchn_write_unlock(rchn);
}
-static long evtchn_bind_interdomain(evtchn_bind_interdomain_t *bind)
+static int evtchn_bind_interdomain(evtchn_bind_interdomain_t *bind)
{
struct evtchn *lchn, *rchn;
struct domain *ld = current->domain, *rd;
- int lport, rport = bind->remote_port;
+ int lport, rc;
+ evtchn_port_t rport = bind->remote_port;
domid_t rdom = bind->remote_dom;
- long rc;
if ( (rd = rcu_lock_domain_by_any_id(rdom)) == NULL )
return -ESRCH;
@@ -488,12 +487,12 @@ int evtchn_bind_virq(evtchn_bind_virq_t
}
-static long evtchn_bind_ipi(evtchn_bind_ipi_t *bind)
+static int evtchn_bind_ipi(evtchn_bind_ipi_t *bind)
{
struct evtchn *chn;
struct domain *d = current->domain;
- int port, vcpu = bind->vcpu;
- long rc = 0;
+ int port, rc = 0;
+ unsigned int vcpu = bind->vcpu;
if ( domain_vcpu(d, vcpu) == NULL )
return -ENOENT;
@@ -547,16 +546,16 @@ static void unlink_pirq_port(struct evtc
}
-static long evtchn_bind_pirq(evtchn_bind_pirq_t *bind)
+static int evtchn_bind_pirq(evtchn_bind_pirq_t *bind)
{
struct evtchn *chn;
struct domain *d = current->domain;
struct vcpu *v = d->vcpu[0];
struct pirq *info;
- int port = 0, pirq = bind->pirq;
- long rc;
+ int port = 0, rc;
+ unsigned int pirq = bind->pirq;
- if ( (pirq < 0) || (pirq >= d->nr_pirqs) )
+ if ( pirq >= d->nr_pirqs )
return -EINVAL;
if ( !is_hvm_domain(d) && !pirq_access_permitted(d, pirq) )
@@ -612,7 +611,7 @@ int evtchn_close(struct domain *d1, int
{
struct domain *d2 = NULL;
struct evtchn *chn1 = _evtchn_from_port(d1, port1), *chn2;
- long rc = 0;
+ int rc = 0;
if ( !chn1 )
return -EINVAL;
@@ -960,7 +959,7 @@ int evtchn_status(evtchn_status_t *statu
struct domain *d;
domid_t dom = status->dom;
struct evtchn *chn;
- long rc = 0;
+ int rc = 0;
d = rcu_lock_domain_by_any_id(dom);
if ( d == NULL )
@@ -1026,11 +1025,11 @@ int evtchn_status(evtchn_status_t *statu
}
-long evtchn_bind_vcpu(unsigned int port, unsigned int vcpu_id)
+int evtchn_bind_vcpu(evtchn_port_t port, unsigned int vcpu_id)
{
struct domain *d = current->domain;
struct evtchn *chn;
- long rc = 0;
+ int rc = 0;
struct vcpu *v;
/* Use the vcpu info to prevent speculative out-of-bound accesses */
@@ -1169,12 +1168,11 @@ int evtchn_reset(struct domain *d, bool
return rc;
}
-static long evtchn_set_priority(const struct evtchn_set_priority *set_priority)
+static int evtchn_set_priority(const struct evtchn_set_priority *set_priority)
{
struct domain *d = current->domain;
- unsigned int port = set_priority->port;
- struct evtchn *chn = _evtchn_from_port(d, port);
- long ret;
+ struct evtchn *chn = _evtchn_from_port(d, set_priority->port);
+ int ret;
if ( !chn )
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1190,7 +1188,7 @@ static long evtchn_set_priority(const st
long do_event_channel_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
{
- long rc;
+ int rc;
switch ( cmd )
{
--- a/xen/include/xen/event.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/event.h
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ void send_guest_pirq(struct domain *, co
int evtchn_send(struct domain *d, unsigned int lport);
/* Bind a local event-channel port to the specified VCPU. */
-long evtchn_bind_vcpu(unsigned int port, unsigned int vcpu_id);
+int evtchn_bind_vcpu(evtchn_port_t port, unsigned int vcpu_id);
/* Bind a VIRQ. */
int evtchn_bind_virq(evtchn_bind_virq_t *bind, evtchn_port_t port);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-27 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-27 8:13 [PATCH v5 0/6] evtchn: (not so) recent XSAs follow-on Jan Beulich
2021-01-27 8:15 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] evtchn: use per-channel lock where possible Jan Beulich
2021-01-27 8:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] evtchn: convert domain event lock to an r/w one Jan Beulich
2021-05-27 11:01 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-05-27 11:16 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-07 18:00 ` Julien Grall
2021-01-27 8:16 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] evtchn: slightly defer lock acquire where possible Jan Beulich
2021-01-27 8:16 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] evtchn: add helper for port_is_valid() + evtchn_from_port() Jan Beulich
2021-01-27 8:17 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2021-01-27 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] evtchn: drop acquiring of per-channel lock from send_guest_{global,vcpu}_virq() Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 15:23 ` Ping: [PATCH v5 0/6] evtchn: (not so) recent XSAs follow-on Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 15:56 ` Julien Grall
2021-04-22 8:53 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-14 15:29 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-05-17 7:15 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3cb6de31-39e3-43ff-2a9f-a09aa1b1fc26@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).