xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: jgross@suse.com,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>,
	Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13 v3] xen/arm: fix buf size in make_cpus_node
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:48:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cfd5f51-8cc0-03aa-dcfc-af2d59488fc0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191008231211.31110-1-sstabellini@kernel.org>

Hi Stefano,

On 09/10/2019 00:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> The size of buf is calculated wrongly: the number is printed as a
> hexadecimal number, so we need 8 bytes for 32bit, not 10 bytes.
> 
> As a result, it should be sizeof("cpu@") + 8 bytes for a 32-bit number +
> 1 byte for \0. Total = 13.
> 
> mpidr_aff is 64-bit, however, only bits [0-23] are used. Add a check for
> that.

I am not entirely happy with the commit message. There are no real issue with 
the current code (the buffer is big enough) as mpdir_aff can only have [23:0] 
set in the current code.

The patch is only hardening the code and that should be reflected in the commit 
message.

So how about:

xen/arm: domain_build: Harden make_cpus_node()

make_cpus_node() is using a static buffer to generate the FDT node name.

While mpdir_aff is a 64-bit integer, we only ever use the bits [23:0] as only 
AFF{0, 1, 2} are supported for now.

To avoid any potential issue in the future, check that mpdir_aff has only bits 
[23:0] set.

At the same time, take the opportunity to reduce the size of the buffer. Indeed, 
only 8 characters is useful to generate an 32-bit hexadecimal number. So 
sizeof("cpu@") + 8 = 13 characters is sufficient here.

> 
> Fixes: c81a791d34 (xen/arm: Set 'reg' of cpu node for dom0 to match MPIDR's affinity)
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>
> Release-acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - make sure only [23:0] bits are used in mpidr_aff
> - clarify that we only need 32bit for buf writes
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - patch added
> ---
>   xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> index 921b054520..d5ee639548 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> @@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ static int __init make_cpus_node(const struct domain *d, void *fdt)
>       const void *compatible = NULL;
>       u32 len;
>       /* Placeholder for cpu@ + a 32-bit number + \0 */

I think you want to update the comment to say "32-bit hexa number".

> -    char buf[15];
> +    char buf[13];

This is a confusing code to read because above you mention this is a 32-bit 
number, but below you are using PRIx64. It takes a bit of time to figure out 
that mpdir_aff will always have bits above 32-bit zeroed.

I would prefer to use a temporary variable for the register, but I would be 
happy to consider a suitable comment in code.

>       u32 clock_frequency;
>       bool clock_valid;
>       uint64_t mpidr_aff;
> @@ -847,8 +847,18 @@ static int __init make_cpus_node(const struct domain *d, void *fdt)
>            * the MPIDR's affinity bits. We will use AFF0 and AFF1 when
>            * constructing the reg value of the guest at the moment, for it
>            * is enough for the current max vcpu number.
> +         *
> +         * We only deal with AFF{0, 1, 2} stored in bits [23:0] at the
> +         * moment.
>            */
>           mpidr_aff = vcpuid_to_vaffinity(cpu);
> +        if ( (mpidr_aff & ~GENMASK_ULL(23, 0)) != 0 )
> +        {
> +            printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to handle MPIDR AFFINITY 0x%"PRIx64"\n",
> +                   mpidr_aff);
> +            return -EINVAL;
> +        }
> +
>           dt_dprintk("Create cpu@%"PRIx64" (logical CPUID: %d) node\n",
>                      mpidr_aff, cpu);
>   
> 

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-08 23:12 [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13 v3] xen/arm: fix buf size in make_cpus_node Stefano Stabellini
2019-10-09 14:48 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2019-10-10  0:40   ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3cfd5f51-8cc0-03aa-dcfc-af2d59488fc0@arm.com \
    --to=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).