xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rahul Singh <Rahul.Singh@arm.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	"Bertrand Marquis" <Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com>,
	"Paul Durrant" <paul@xen.org>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	"Ian Jackson" <iwj@xenproject.org>,
	"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	"Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>, "Daniel De Graaf" <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen/pci: Gate all MSI code in common code with CONFIG_HAS_PCI_MSI
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 08:45:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <479D17E5-3021-4A2E-B066-D179226CC48B@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0071311d-6da5-636b-b823-32b5570d8f49@suse.com>


> On 8 Apr 2021, at 7:00 am, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> On 07.04.2021 20:06, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>> On 06/04/2021 16:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 06.04.2021 16:30, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>> Hi Roger,
>>>> On 06/04/2021 15:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:39:11PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
>>>>>> MSI support is not implemented for ARM architecture but it is enabled
>>>>>> for x86 architecture and referenced in common passthrough/pci.c code.
>>>>>> Therefore introducing the new flag to gate the MSI code for ARM in
>>>>>> common code to avoid compilation error when HAS_PCI is enabled for ARM.
>>>>> Is such option really interesting long term?
>>>>> IIRC PCI Express mandates MSI support, at which point I don't see much
>>>>> value in being able to compile out the MSI support.
>>>> I am pretty sure there are board out with PCI support but no MSI
>>>> support. Anyway, even if the spec may mandate it...
>>>>> So while maybe helpful for Arm PCI efforts ATM, I'm not sure it
>>>>> warrants a Kconfig option, I would rather see Arm introduce dummy
>>>>> helpers for the missing functionality, even if unimplemented at the
>>>>> moment.
>>>> ... from my understanding, most of (if not all) the MSI code is not very
>>>> useful on Arm when using the GICv3 ITS.
>>>> The GICv3 ITS will do the isolation for you and therefore we should not
>>>> need to keep track of the state at the vPCI level.
>>> But that's then not "has PCI MSI" but "need to intercept PCI MSI
>>> accesses", i.e. I don't think the Kconfig option is correctly
>>> named. If a device with MSI support is used, you can't make that
>>> MSI support go away, after all.
>> That's actually a good point. Rahul, do you think the config can be 
>> renamed to something like CONFIG_PCI_MSI_NEED_INTERCEPT?
> Minor remark: In this name I'd be inclined to suggest to omit NEED.

OK . I will use the name CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT and will send next version of the patch.


> Jan

      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-08  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-06 11:39 [PATCH 0/2] xen/pci: Make PCI passthrough code non-x86 specific Rahul Singh
2021-04-06 11:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen/pci: Move PCI ATS code to common directory Rahul Singh
2021-04-06 15:16   ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-06 11:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen/pci: Gate all MSI code in common code with CONFIG_HAS_PCI_MSI Rahul Singh
2021-04-06 14:13   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-06 14:30     ` Julien Grall
2021-04-06 14:59       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-06 15:09         ` Julien Grall
2021-04-06 15:58           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-07 17:52             ` Rahul Singh
2021-04-06 15:25       ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-07 18:06         ` Julien Grall
2021-04-08  6:00           ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-08  8:45             ` Rahul Singh [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=479D17E5-3021-4A2E-B066-D179226CC48B@arm.com \
    --to=rahul.singh@arm.com \
    --cc=Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen/pci: Gate all MSI code in common code with CONFIG_HAS_PCI_MSI' \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).