From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23D5C433DF for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D6E121D81 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=citrix.com header.i=@citrix.com header.b="cbX8m2MV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2D6E121D81 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.6972.18235 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSl8v-0007Ph-HP; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:04:53 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 6972.18235; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:04:53 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSl8v-0007Pa-EJ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:04:53 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 6972; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:04:52 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSl8u-0007PV-5j for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:04:52 +0000 Received: from esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.145.155]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 69f65ee3-45a0-4c28-8e51-5ae7fb18b630; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSl8u-0007PV-5j for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:04:52 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 69f65ee3-45a0-4c28-8e51-5ae7fb18b630 Received: from esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.145.155]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 69f65ee3-45a0-4c28-8e51-5ae7fb18b630; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:04:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1602698692; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QP9dZ/kf6WxmC+XFLjXj3iwd2bvWj8WJ3e4EPYelksU=; b=cbX8m2MVku/e5Qrxnq+oLOzUIsZFGod8c8cMGPzcqOQHRkpWR3/MycbY tSThLTTgL1UiSoPcA8epbj8K8U1RJynPo8KfDkdGUOYzp4zIRgA9lAXzK j8ZtX6/R9SkHMinRm7Y8A5KLHHQ7RfGDT19M8ohV40d2grCHEts8ESKP9 8=; Authentication-Results: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none IronPort-SDR: RkRU6LoFb+K0uroA17V3eGSGvjuUUGMUujSWCqKRxmtq2qsv7vOw8BkkHt9zfs7MM0a9cL4/Ft 2dUiIVTILpDeiiulU9gHbgx2gjg8+21xfs5GSiPybMgsipLEe8gUsLsaJNrwhMSLLMQsemLMrK wdiahS+UH2PIC8/GMR79mm8Bs/hMc8XQYiz5aXGXmdH8ykSz0VWu7I/DAiuKR6KfhXRT9DtM9v zbRh/CILhefBnCwff+hwhCnTEGRqgmAYgX+34s8k22jyocg6vnUZJwOQKaxQIPzmtyJ671KRly GoE= X-SBRS: 2.5 X-MesageID: 28991967 X-Ironport-Server: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,375,1596513600"; d="scan'208";a="28991967" Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM][PATCH 0/2] Remove Xen PVH dependency on PCI To: Jason Andryuk , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , "Stefano Stabellini" , CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , References: <20201014175342.152712-1-jandryuk@gmail.com> From: Andrew Cooper Message-ID: <4973553f-fad2-83b9-fa19-26370ced2c2d@citrix.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:04:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201014175342.152712-1-jandryuk@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB X-ClientProxiedBy: AMSPEX02CAS01.citrite.net (10.69.22.112) To FTLPEX02CL05.citrite.net (10.13.108.178) On 14/10/2020 18:53, Jason Andryuk wrote: > A Xen PVH domain doesn't have a PCI bus or devices, [*] Yet. > so it doesn't need PCI support built in. Untangling the dependences is a good thing, but eventually we plan to put an optional PCI bus back in, e.g. for SRIOV usecases. ~Andrew