From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/32] Introduce HVM without dm and new boot ABI Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 17:19:58 +0100 Message-ID: <5596B62E.7010306@citrix.com> References: <1435923310-9019-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZB3h5-0006mT-K9 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 16:20:03 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1435923310-9019-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Roger Pau Monne , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/07/15 12:34, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > And for the FreeBSD part: Have you thought at all about what the Linux support for this mode would look like? I started briefly looking today but don't really have time to look into it properly. I do think we want to use as much of the native/HVM code as possible and avoid the PV path (the current Linux PVH code uses too much of the PV entry point, IMO). David