From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: PCI Pass-through in Xen ARM - Draft 2. Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:45:16 +0100 Message-ID: <559A6A4C.1090401@citrix.com> References: <55903F12.7010908@caviumnetworks.com> <55911E66.2040009@citrix.com> <5598C6CD.2040207@caviumnetworks.com> <559A5BE4.1060707@citrix.com> <559A61FB.9070707@caviumnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <559A61FB.9070707@caviumnetworks.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Manish Jaggi , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Ian Campbell , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Stefano Stabellini , "Kulkarni, Ganapatrao" , Prasun Kapoor , "Kumar, Vijaya" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/07/15 12:09, Manish Jaggi wrote: > > > On Monday 06 July 2015 04:13 PM, Julien Grall wrote: >> On 05/07/15 06:55, Manish Jaggi wrote: >>>>> 4.3 Hypercall for bdf mapping notification to xen >>>>> ----------------------------------------------- >>>>> #define PHYSDEVOP_map_sbdf 43 >>>>> typedef struct { >>>>> u32 s; >>>>> u8 b; >>>>> u8 df; >>>>> u16 res; >>>>> } sbdf_t; >>>>> struct physdev_map_sbdf { >>>>> int domain_id; >>>>> sbdf_t sbdf; >>>>> sbdf_t gsbdf; >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> Each domain has a pdev list, which contains the list of all pci >>>>> devices. >>>>> The >>>>> pdev structure already has a sbdf information. The arch_pci_dev is >>>>> updated to >>>>> contain the gsbdf information. (gs- guest segment id) >>>>> >>>>> Whenever there is trap from guest or an interrupt has to be injected, >>>>> the pdev >>>>> list is iterated to find the gsbdf. >>>> Can you give more background for this section? i.e: >>>> - Why do you need this? >>>> - How xen will translate the gbdf to a vDeviceID? >>> In the context of the hypercall processing. >> That wasn't my question. I asked, how Xen will find the mapping between >> the gdbf and vDeviceID? He doesn't have access to the firmware table and >> therefore not able to find the right one. > I believe gsbdf and vDeviceID would be same. Xen and the guest need to translate the gsbdf the same way. If this is clearly defined by a spec, then you should give a link to it. If not, you have to explain in this design doc how you plan to have xen and the guest using the same vdevID for a given gsbdf. Regards, -- Julien Grall