From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/17] xen/arm: Add bitmap_find_next_zero_area helper function Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:07:37 +0100 Message-ID: <559FB589020000780008F60C@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <1436514172-3263-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <1436514172-3263-2-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <559FA610020000780008F49B@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Vijay Kilari Cc: Keir Fraser , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , Prasun Kapoor , Tim Deegan , manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com, Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , Vijaya Kumar K List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 10.07.15 at 11:45, wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 10.07.15 at 09:42, wrote: >>> From: Vijaya Kumar K >>> >>> bitmap_find_next_zero_area helper function will be used >>> by physical ITS driver. This is imported from linux >> >> version? Certainly not any 4.x, i.e. nothing reasonably recent. > > This is based on 3.18. However this function in 4.x is calling by > bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off() with align_offset set to 0. > So functionality wise this is same. Yeah, but why would we not take the most up-to-date variant? Jan