From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: Requesting for freeze exception for RMRR
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:11:18 +0100
Message-ID: <55A38EC6020000780008FF73@mail.emea.novell.com>
References: <55A35B5E.3000805@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <55A35B5E.3000805@intel.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: "wei.liu2@citrix.com" <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Kevin <kevin.tian@intel.com>, "ian.campbell@citrix.com" <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, "ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com" <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Yong Y Wang <yong.y.wang@intel.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

>>> On 13.07.15 at 08:31, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> 3. explain why it doesn't break things (risks).
> 
> Our policy makes sure that system will work in the original way by 
> default as without the RMRR patches. And especially, this series just 
> impacts those platforms which have RMRR.

I think this should read "Our policy intends to make sure ...", making
more clear that there is a risk here (supported by the history of the
series).

Jan