From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [v10][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid
 conflicts with RDM
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:22:50 +0800
Message-ID: <55AE63CA.8040704@intel.com>
References: <1437373023-14884-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
	<1437373023-14884-12-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
	<21932.63595.566823.211293@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<21934.8684.318670.874156@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<55AE272A.4020306@intel.com>
	<21934.10490.615041.203428@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<55AE2BB1.9030604@intel.com>
	<21934.11410.844215.554291@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<55AE30D4.8000009@intel.com>
	<21934.15393.528332.534956@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<55AE4C12.5070303@intel.com>
	<21934.24792.250014.346947@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <21934.24792.250014.346947@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

>> Just to your example,
>>
>>     libxl_domain_config cfg;
>>     cfg.stuff = blah;
>>     cfg.rdm.strategy = HOST;
>>
>>     libxl_domain_create_new(&cfg, &domid);
>>     libxl_domain_destroy(domid);
>>
>> Here looks you mean d_config->rdms would be changed, right? Currently
>> this shouldn't be allowed. But I think we need to further discussion
>> make this case clear after feature freeze since we didn't have this kind
>> of assumption in our previous design.
>>
>>     libxl_domain_create_new(&cfg, &domid);
>
> This response of yours does not lead me to think you have understood
> what I am saying, but I agree that this can be dealt with later (if

Indeed, I'm not a fan to Xen tools so I can't picture what this real 
scenario would happen. So if I'm misunderstanding what you mean, just 
please correct me. Or if you still think its hard to explain this to me, 
just tell me what I should do. I think this make your life easy.

Thanks
Tiejun

> indeed it needs to be dealt with at all).
>
> Ian.
>