From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chen, Tiejun" Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:40:52 +0800 Message-ID: <55B0E0D4.7010405@intel.com> References: <1437579859-24485-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> <1437579859-24485-4-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> <21936.54212.592097.157376@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <55B0DAF0.4010706@intel.com> <21936.56266.74555.560825@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1437654452.19412.99.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1437654452.19412.99.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Ian Jackson Cc: Kevin Tian , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser , Suravee Suthikulpanit , George Dunlap , Andrew Cooper , Tim Deegan , Stefano Stabellini , Aravind Gopalakrishnan , Jan Beulich , Yang Zhang , Wei Liu List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Can you avoid the mention of DT in the comment please, since PCI will > eventually go that path. Something like "No flags are defined for ARM" > would suffice I think. Works for me. But in some way "0" also represents one valid flag. So what about this ? No flags are defined for ARM so its always safe to set 0. Thanks Tiejun