From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access fails without !panic_on_oops Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:32:00 -0700 Message-ID: <560C2AA0.5040708__42723.6930154779$1443638076$gmane$org@zytor.com> References: <130a3b7ef4788baae3a6fe71293ab17442bc9a0a.1442793572.git.luto@kernel.org> <20150921084642.GA30984@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar Cc: KVM list , Peter Zijlstra , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , xen-devel , Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Gleixner , Andy Lutomirski , Arjan van de Ven , Andrew Morton List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/21/2015 09:36 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > How many msr reads are so critical that the function call > overhead would matter? Get rid of the inline version of the _safe() > thing too, and put that thing there too. > Probably only the ones that may go in the context switch path. -hpa