xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
To: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>, PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: Status of multiboot2 support on EFI?
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:50:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B12499.1050005@cardoe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160202212054.GN3485@olila.local.net-space.pl>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1243 bytes --]

On 2/2/16 3:20 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 01:02:56PM -0800, PGNet Dev wrote:
>> Here http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_EFI#Xen_as_gz_binary refers
>> to original discussion in 2013 (work has been deferred to Xen 4.6. )
>>
>> and says "work has been deferred to Xen 4.6."
>>
>>> I think that this should be Xen 4.8 target.
>>
>> That's roughly another year+ from now for EFI support?
>>
>> Per, http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Roadmap, there's no 4.8
>> info at all.
>>
>> But 8months plus 4.7 release =~ Feb 2017?
> 
> Sadly I am not able to devote 100% of my time to this project right now.
> Maybe it will happen when I finish our internal work. However, I think
> that there is another option. You can help with some stuff on this issue.
> This way we may finish whole project a bit earlier.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> PS I can post latest patchset (it does not contain all suggested fixes)
>    rebased on latest master. This way you can continue your work in
>    more friendly environment. Is it sufficient for you?

Can you make a branch available somewhere? You don't even have to rebase
it. That way others will be able to rebase and hopefully move it forward.

-- 
Doug Goldstein


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 959 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-02 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-02 17:01 Status of multiboot2 support on EFI? PGNet Dev
2016-02-02 17:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-02 17:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-02 20:49   ` Daniel Kiper
2016-02-02 21:02     ` PGNet Dev
2016-02-02 21:20       ` Daniel Kiper
2016-02-02 21:24         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-02 21:50         ` Doug Goldstein [this message]
2016-02-03 16:08           ` Daniel Kiper
2016-02-03 17:03             ` Daniel Kiper
2016-02-12 19:08               ` Daniel Kiper
2016-03-10 10:28                 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-02-03 11:16       ` Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56B12499.1050005@cardoe.com \
    --to=cardoe@cardoe.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
    --cc=pgnet.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).