From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [RFC Design Doc] Add vNVDIMM support for Xen Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 07:39:44 -0700 Message-ID: <56B21F4002000078000CE25A@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> References: <20160201054414.GA25211@hz-desktop.sh.intel.com> <20160202191519.GB21656@char.us.oracle.com> <20160203082831.GB4248@hz-desktop.sh.intel.com> <56B1D3FE02000078000CDD92@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <56B20F19.30303@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56B20F19.30303@citrix.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper , Haozhong Zhang , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Juergen Gross , Kevin Tian , Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jun Nakajima , Xiao Guangrong , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 03.02.16 at 15:30, wrote: > On 03/02/16 09:18, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> >>>> In other words - the NVDIMM resource does not provide any resource >>>> isolation. However this may not be any different than what we had >>>> nowadays with CPU caches. >>>> >>> Does Xen have any mechanism to isolate multiple guests' operations on >>> CPU caches? >> No. > > PSR Cache Allocation is supported in Xen 4.6 on supporting hardware, so > the administrator can partition guests if necessary. And if the hardware supports it (which for a while might be more the exception than the rule). Jan