xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Harmandeep Kaur <write.harmandeep@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for XenProject
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:06:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CED235.7000506@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456394431.6225.182.camel@citrix.com>

On 25/02/16 10:00, Ian Campbell wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 21:02 -0800, scan-admin@coverity.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to XenProject found with Coverity Scan.
>>
>> 2 new defect(s) introduced to XenProject found with Coverity Scan.
>> 12 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
>>
>> New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
>> Showing 2 of 2 defect(s)
>>
>>
>> ** CID 1354244:  Null pointer dereferences  (FORWARD_NULL)
>> /tools/libxc/xc_tbuf.c: 72 in xc_tbuf_get_size()
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>> *** CID 1354244:  Null pointer dereferences  (FORWARD_NULL)
>> /tools/libxc/xc_tbuf.c: 72 in xc_tbuf_get_size()
>> 66             return rc;
>> 67     
>> 68         t_info = xc_map_foreign_range(xch, DOMID_XEN,
>> 69                         sysctl.u.tbuf_op.size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>> 70                         sysctl.u.tbuf_op.buffer_mfn);
>> 71     
>>>>>     CID 1354244:  Null pointer dereferences  (FORWARD_NULL)
>>>>>     Comparing "t_info" to null implies that "t_info" might be null.
>> 72         if ( t_info == NULL || t_info->tbuf_size == 0 )
>> 73             rc = -1;
>> 74         else
>> 75     	*size = t_info->tbuf_size;
>> 76     
>> 77         xenforeignmemory_unmap(xch->fmem, t_info, sysctl.u.tbuf_op.size);
> 
> This is complaining about the eventual munmap(t_info) => munmap(NULL) which
> is behind xenforeignmemory_unmap().
> 
> Looks like it was newly added by the fix to CID 1351228 in 7c479883b04a
> ("libxc: fix leak of t_info in xc_tbuf_get_size()").
> xenforeignmemory_unmap() should behave like munmap WRT tollerance of NULL,
> I'm not 100% sure what that behaviour is since 0 is a valid address.
> xenforeignmemory.h no doubt wants updating with the desired semantics and
> either this code of the implementation adjusting to match.
> 
> While here I notice that using xc_map_*() to create the mapping and
> xenforeignmemory_unmap() to destroy it is a bit odd since they are strictly
> two separate APIs, even if one happens to be implemented in terms of the
> other. Being libxc internal this code is at liberty to use xc_map_* but
> should then use plain munmap to undo it, or it would also be reasonable to
> port this code fully to the xenforeignmemory interface.
> 
>>
>> ** CID 1354243:  Control flow issues  (DEADCODE)
>> /tools/xentrace/xenalyze.c: 4148 in cr3_dump_list()
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>> *** CID 1354243:  Control flow issues  (DEADCODE)
>> /tools/xentrace/xenalyze.c: 4148 in cr3_dump_list()
>> 4142     
>> 4143         /* Count the number of elements */
>> 4144         for(p=head; p; p=p->next)
>> 4145             N++;
>> 4146     
>> 4147         if(!N)
>>>>>     CID 1354243:  Control flow issues  (DEADCODE)
>>>>>     Execution cannot reach this statement: "return;".
> 
> Here it has observed that due to the (above, just out of the context given
> here) "if (!head) return" that the for loop must run at least once, so N
> cannot be 0.
> 
> My guess is that this is a prexisting issue which was exposed to coverities
> beady eye somehow by 28ab9f3d0e7c ("tools/xenalyze: Fix build with clang").
> Or maybe this was previous marked deliberate but the change has caused
> coverity to think this is a different instance of the same thing, eitherway
> I don't think the issue itself is new.
> 
> FWIW having both if (!head) return and if (!N) return looks redundant to
> me, the other two similar looking instances (from grepping for N++) have
> only the latter check.

Yes, they're certainly redundant, and I definitely prefer the latter
check rather than the former.  I'll send a patch.

 -George


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-25 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <56ce8ad13abd2_bd9abd33094410@ss1435.mail>
2016-02-25 10:00 ` New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for XenProject Ian Campbell
2016-02-25 10:06   ` George Dunlap [this message]
     [not found] <664dc165759df_5e9362b92d249399c762@prd-scan-dashboard-0.mail>
2024-05-22 10:05 ` Jan Beulich
2024-05-22 13:49   ` Andrew Cooper
     [not found] <6637576caf98c_10d9e42c57d37559ac60499@prd-scan-dashboard-0.mail>
2024-05-06  7:46 ` Jan Beulich
     [not found] <6547674e54da3_1c3af2c62521719a8359bc@prd-scan-dashboard-0.mail>
2023-11-06  7:36 ` Jan Beulich
     [not found] <64859cf3a1e46_712752abb10eab98834b9@prd-scan-dashboard-0.mail>
2023-06-12 10:54 ` Jan Beulich
2023-06-12 11:06   ` Andrew Cooper
     [not found] <600d4d7f99bc3_241662b17c874cf6097f1@prd-scan-dashboard-0.mail>
2021-01-25 10:14 ` Jan Beulich
     [not found] <5700f7b3e7d5c_3fdf4db3186252@ss1435.mail>
2016-04-04 15:07 ` Ian Jackson
     [not found] <551be9e0474d8_2970d1331454394@scan.coverity.com.mail>
2015-04-02 14:32 ` Ian Campbell
2015-04-02 15:43   ` Charles Arnold
     [not found] <E1Vgaam-0000UH-GS@build-l3.scan.coverity.com>
2013-11-13 13:51 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-13 14:01   ` David Vrabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56CED235.7000506@citrix.com \
    --to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=write.harmandeep@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).