xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>, konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/events: Mask a moving irq
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:53:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EAE0F7.4060703__13670.4698125415$1458233658$gmane$org@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56EAD55A.6020801@citrix.com>

On 03/17/2016 12:03 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 17/03/16 12:45, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Moving an unmasked irq may result in irq handler being invoked on both
>> source and target CPUs.
>> With 2-level this can happen as follows:
>> On source CPU:
>>          evtchn_2l_handle_events() ->
>>              generic_handle_irq() ->
>>                  handle_edge_irq() ->
>>                     eoi_pirq():
>>                         irq_move_irq(data);
>>                         /***** WE ARE HERE *****/
>>                         if (VALID_EVTCHN(evtchn))
>>                             clear_evtchn(evtchn);
>> If at this moment target processor is handling an unrelated event in
>> evtchn_2l_handle_events()'s loop it may pick up our event since target's
>> cpu_evtchn_mask claims that this event belongs to it *and* the event is
>> unmasked and still pending. At the same time, source CPU will continue
>> executing its own handle_edge_irq().
>> With FIFO interrupt the scenario is similar: irq_move_irq() may result
>> in a EVTCHNOP_unmask hypercall which, in turn, may make the event
>> pending on the target CPU.
>> We can avoid this situation by moving and clearing the event while
>> keeping event masked.
> Can you do:
>     if (unlikely(irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(data))) {
>         masked = test_and_set_mask()
>         clear_evtchn()
>         irq_move_masked_irq()

I did think about this but then I wasn't sure whether this might open 
some other window for things to sneak in. It shouldn't but these things 
are rather subtle so I'd rather leave the order of how operations are 
done unchanged.

But I should indeed use irq_move_masked_irq() instead of irq_move_irq().


>         unmask(masked);
>     } else
>         clear_evtchn()

Xen-devel mailing list

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-17 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1458218750-5202-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
2016-03-17 16:03 ` [PATCH] xen/events: Mask a moving irq David Vrabel
     [not found] ` <56EAD55A.6020801@citrix.com>
2016-03-17 16:53   ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
     [not found]   ` <56EAE0F7.4060703@oracle.com>
2016-03-17 17:29     ` David Vrabel
     [not found]     ` <56EAE95D.6020006@citrix.com>
2016-03-17 17:49       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-03-17 12:45 Boris Ostrovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='56EAE0F7.4060703__13670.4698125415$1458233658$gmane$org@oracle.com' \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).