xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/events: Mask a moving irq
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:29:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EAE95D.6020006__496.062954380427$1458235834$gmane$org@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56EAE0F7.4060703@oracle.com>

On 17/03/16 16:53, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 03/17/2016 12:03 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 17/03/16 12:45, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> Moving an unmasked irq may result in irq handler being invoked on both
>>> source and target CPUs.
>>> With 2-level this can happen as follows:
>>> On source CPU:
>>>          evtchn_2l_handle_events() ->
>>>              generic_handle_irq() ->
>>>                  handle_edge_irq() ->
>>>                     eoi_pirq():
>>>                         irq_move_irq(data);
>>>                         /***** WE ARE HERE *****/
>>>                         if (VALID_EVTCHN(evtchn))
>>>                             clear_evtchn(evtchn);
>>> If at this moment target processor is handling an unrelated event in
>>> evtchn_2l_handle_events()'s loop it may pick up our event since target's
>>> cpu_evtchn_mask claims that this event belongs to it *and* the event is
>>> unmasked and still pending. At the same time, source CPU will continue
>>> executing its own handle_edge_irq().
>>> With FIFO interrupt the scenario is similar: irq_move_irq() may result
>>> in a EVTCHNOP_unmask hypercall which, in turn, may make the event
>>> pending on the target CPU.
>>> We can avoid this situation by moving and clearing the event while
>>> keeping event masked.
>> Can you do:
>>     if (unlikely(irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(data))) {
>>         masked = test_and_set_mask()
>>         clear_evtchn()
>>         irq_move_masked_irq()
> I did think about this but then I wasn't sure whether this might open
> some other window for things to sneak in. It shouldn't but these things
> are rather subtle so I'd rather leave the order of how operations are
> done unchanged.

This is the order your patch has though.  I'm confused.

> But I should indeed use irq_move_masked_irq() instead of irq_move_irq().


Xen-devel mailing list

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-17 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1458218750-5202-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
2016-03-17 16:03 ` [PATCH] xen/events: Mask a moving irq David Vrabel
     [not found] ` <56EAD55A.6020801@citrix.com>
2016-03-17 16:53   ` Boris Ostrovsky
     [not found]   ` <56EAE0F7.4060703@oracle.com>
2016-03-17 17:29     ` David Vrabel [this message]
     [not found]     ` <56EAE95D.6020006@citrix.com>
2016-03-17 17:49       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-03-17 12:45 Boris Ostrovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='56EAE95D.6020006__496.062954380427$1458235834$gmane$org@citrix.com' \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).