xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] x86/time: refactor read_platform_stime()
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:22:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5703D852.8040909@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5703C31302000078000E326A@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>



On 04/05/2016 12:52 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 29.03.16 at 15:44, <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> wrote:
>> -static s_time_t read_platform_stime(void)
>> +static s_time_t read_platform_stime(u64 *stamp)
>>  {
>> -    u64 count;
>> +    u64 plt_stamp_counter, count;
> 
> "stamp" and "counter" seem kind of redundant.
> 
A bit, perhaps you prefer the latter? There was a variable named "count", so I
named "stamp" for clearer distinction between the variables and the output arg.

>>      s_time_t stime;
>>  
>>      ASSERT(!local_irq_is_enabled());
>>  
>>      spin_lock(&platform_timer_lock);
>> -    count = plt_stamp64 + ((plt_src.read_counter() - plt_stamp) & plt_mask);
>> +    plt_stamp_counter = plt_src.read_counter();
>> +    count = plt_stamp64 + ((plt_stamp_counter - plt_stamp) & plt_mask);
>>      stime = __read_platform_stime(count);
>> +    if ( stamp )
>> +        *stamp = plt_stamp_counter;
>>      spin_unlock(&platform_timer_lock);
> 
> What reason is there to do that conditional write inside the locked
> region?
> 
None, I should move this conditional write out of this region.

Joao

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-05 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-29 13:44 [PATCH v2 0/6] x86/time: PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT support Joao Martins
2016-03-29 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] public/xen.h: add flags field to vcpu_time_info Joao Martins
2016-03-30 15:49   ` Ian Jackson
2016-03-30 16:33     ` Joao Martins
2016-03-31  7:09     ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-31  7:13   ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-31 11:04     ` Joao Martins
2016-04-05 10:16   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-05 10:59     ` Joao Martins
2016-03-29 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] x86/time: refactor init_platform_time() Joao Martins
2016-04-01 16:10   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-01 18:26     ` Joao Martins
2016-04-05 10:09   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-05 10:55     ` Joao Martins
2016-04-05 11:16       ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-29 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] x86/time: implement tsc as clocksource Joao Martins
2016-03-29 17:39   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-29 17:52     ` Joao Martins
2016-04-01 16:43   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-01 18:38     ` Joao Martins
2016-04-01 18:45       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-03 18:47         ` Joao Martins
2016-04-05 10:43   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-05 14:56     ` Joao Martins
2016-04-05 15:12       ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-05 17:07         ` Joao Martins
2016-03-29 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] x86/time: streamline platform time init on plt_init() Joao Martins
2016-04-05 11:46   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-05 15:12     ` Joao Martins
2016-04-05 15:22       ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-05 17:17         ` Joao Martins
2016-03-29 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] x86/time: refactor read_platform_stime() Joao Martins
2016-04-01 18:32   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-05 11:52   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-05 15:22     ` Joao Martins [this message]
2016-04-05 15:26       ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-05 17:08         ` Joao Martins
2016-03-29 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] x86/time: implement PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT Joao Martins
2016-04-05 12:22   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-05 21:34     ` Joao Martins
2016-04-07 15:58       ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-07 21:17         ` Joao Martins
2016-04-07 21:32           ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5703D852.8040909@oracle.com \
    --to=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).