xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/HVM: don't calculate XSTATE area sizes in software
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 09:06:32 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <574F161802000078000F07FD@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <574F13FB02000078000F07D9@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2606 bytes --]

Use hardware output instead, brining HVM behavior in line with PV one
in this regard.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
@@ -3362,7 +3362,7 @@ void hvm_cpuid(unsigned int input, unsig
 
     switch ( input )
     {
-        unsigned int sub_leaf, _eax, _ebx, _ecx, _edx;
+        unsigned int _ecx, _edx;
 
     case 0x1:
         /* Fix up VLAPIC details. */
@@ -3440,42 +3440,24 @@ void hvm_cpuid(unsigned int input, unsig
             *eax = *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0;
             break;
         }
-        /* EBX value of main leaf 0 depends on enabled xsave features */
-        if ( count == 0 && v->arch.xcr0 ) 
-        {
-            /* reset EBX to default value first */
-            *ebx = XSTATE_AREA_MIN_SIZE; 
-            for ( sub_leaf = 2; sub_leaf < 63; sub_leaf++ )
-            {
-                if ( !(v->arch.xcr0 & (1ULL << sub_leaf)) )
-                    continue;
-                domain_cpuid(d, input, sub_leaf, &_eax, &_ebx, &_ecx, 
-                             &_edx);
-                if ( (_eax + _ebx) > *ebx )
-                    *ebx = _eax + _ebx;
-            }
-        }
-
-        if ( count == 1 )
+        switch ( count )
         {
+        case 1:
             *eax &= hvm_featureset[FEATURESET_Da1];
-
-            if ( *eax & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES) )
+            if ( !(*eax & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES)) )
             {
-                uint64_t xfeatures = v->arch.xcr0 | v->arch.hvm_vcpu.msr_xss;
-
-                *ebx = XSTATE_AREA_MIN_SIZE;
-                if ( xfeatures & ~XSTATE_FP_SSE )
-                    for ( sub_leaf = 2; sub_leaf < 63; sub_leaf++ )
-                        if ( xfeatures & (1ULL << sub_leaf) )
-                        {
-                            if ( test_bit(sub_leaf, &xstate_align) )
-                                *ebx = ROUNDUP(*ebx, 64);
-                            *ebx += xstate_sizes[sub_leaf];
-                        }
-            }
-            else
                 *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0;
+                break;
+            }
+            /* fall through */
+        case 0:
+            /*
+             * Always read CPUID.0xD[ECX=0/1].EBX from hardware, rather than
+             * domain policy.  It varies with enabled xstate, and the correct
+             * xcr0/xss are in context.
+             */
+            cpuid_count(input, count, &dummy, ebx, &dummy, &dummy);
+            break;
         }
         break;
 




[-- Attachment #2: x86-HVM-xstate-CPUID-simplify.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2658 bytes --]

x86/HVM: don't calculate XSTATE area sizes in software

Use hardware output instead, brining HVM behavior in line with PV one
in this regard.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
@@ -3362,7 +3362,7 @@ void hvm_cpuid(unsigned int input, unsig
 
     switch ( input )
     {
-        unsigned int sub_leaf, _eax, _ebx, _ecx, _edx;
+        unsigned int _ecx, _edx;
 
     case 0x1:
         /* Fix up VLAPIC details. */
@@ -3440,42 +3440,24 @@ void hvm_cpuid(unsigned int input, unsig
             *eax = *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0;
             break;
         }
-        /* EBX value of main leaf 0 depends on enabled xsave features */
-        if ( count == 0 && v->arch.xcr0 ) 
-        {
-            /* reset EBX to default value first */
-            *ebx = XSTATE_AREA_MIN_SIZE; 
-            for ( sub_leaf = 2; sub_leaf < 63; sub_leaf++ )
-            {
-                if ( !(v->arch.xcr0 & (1ULL << sub_leaf)) )
-                    continue;
-                domain_cpuid(d, input, sub_leaf, &_eax, &_ebx, &_ecx, 
-                             &_edx);
-                if ( (_eax + _ebx) > *ebx )
-                    *ebx = _eax + _ebx;
-            }
-        }
-
-        if ( count == 1 )
+        switch ( count )
         {
+        case 1:
             *eax &= hvm_featureset[FEATURESET_Da1];
-
-            if ( *eax & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES) )
+            if ( !(*eax & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES)) )
             {
-                uint64_t xfeatures = v->arch.xcr0 | v->arch.hvm_vcpu.msr_xss;
-
-                *ebx = XSTATE_AREA_MIN_SIZE;
-                if ( xfeatures & ~XSTATE_FP_SSE )
-                    for ( sub_leaf = 2; sub_leaf < 63; sub_leaf++ )
-                        if ( xfeatures & (1ULL << sub_leaf) )
-                        {
-                            if ( test_bit(sub_leaf, &xstate_align) )
-                                *ebx = ROUNDUP(*ebx, 64);
-                            *ebx += xstate_sizes[sub_leaf];
-                        }
-            }
-            else
                 *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0;
+                break;
+            }
+            /* fall through */
+        case 0:
+            /*
+             * Always read CPUID.0xD[ECX=0/1].EBX from hardware, rather than
+             * domain policy.  It varies with enabled xstate, and the correct
+             * xcr0/xss are in context.
+             */
+            cpuid_count(input, count, &dummy, ebx, &dummy, &dummy);
+            break;
         }
         break;
 

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-01 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-01 14:57 [PATCH 0/2] x86: xstate CPUID guest output adjustments Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: flush high xstate CPUID sub-leaves to zero Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 15:30   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-01 15:45   ` Wei Liu
2016-06-01 15:06 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2016-06-01 15:35   ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/HVM: don't calculate XSTATE area sizes in software Andrew Cooper
2016-06-01 15:47     ` Wei Liu
2016-06-01 15:50     ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 15:57       ` Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=574F161802000078000F07FD@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).