From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Juergen Gross <JGross@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] xen-pciback: return proper values during BAR sizing
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 02:11:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57554C5D02000078000F1DF1__23615.0441146039$1465200776$gmane$org@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57554B8D02000078000F1DE4@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
Reads following writes with all address bits set to 1 should return all
changeable address bits as one, not the BAR size (nor, as was the case
for the upper half of 64-bit BARs, the high half of the region's end
address). Presumably this didn't cause any problems so far because
consumers use the value to calculate the size (usually via val & -val),
and do nothing else with it.
But also consider the exception here: Unimplemented BARs should always
return all zeroes.
And finally, the check for whether to return the sizing address on read
for the ROM BAR should ignore all non-address bits, not just the ROM
Enable one.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
---
drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- 4.7-rc2-xen-pciback-BAR.orig/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c
+++ 4.7-rc2-xen-pciback-BAR/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int rom_write(struct pci_dev *dev
/* A write to obtain the length must happen as a 32-bit write.
* This does not (yet) support writing individual bytes
*/
- if (value == ~PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE)
+ if ((value | ~PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK) == ~0)
bar->which = 1;
else {
u32 tmpval;
@@ -225,38 +225,42 @@ static inline void read_dev_bar(struct p
(PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY |
PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64))) {
bar_info->val = res[pos - 1].start >> 32;
- bar_info->len_val = res[pos - 1].end >> 32;
+ bar_info->len_val = -resource_size(&res[pos - 1]) >> 32;
return;
}
}
+ if (!res[pos].flags ||
+ (res[pos].flags & (IORESOURCE_DISABLED | IORESOURCE_UNSET |
+ IORESOURCE_BUSY)))
+ return;
+
bar_info->val = res[pos].start |
(res[pos].flags & PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK);
- bar_info->len_val = resource_size(&res[pos]);
+ bar_info->len_val = -resource_size(&res[pos]) |
+ (res[pos].flags & PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK);
}
static void *bar_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset)
{
- struct pci_bar_info *bar = kmalloc(sizeof(*bar), GFP_KERNEL);
+ struct pci_bar_info *bar = kzalloc(sizeof(*bar), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bar)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
read_dev_bar(dev, bar, offset, ~0);
- bar->which = 0;
return bar;
}
static void *rom_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset)
{
- struct pci_bar_info *bar = kmalloc(sizeof(*bar), GFP_KERNEL);
+ struct pci_bar_info *bar = kzalloc(sizeof(*bar), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bar)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
read_dev_bar(dev, bar, offset, ~PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE);
- bar->which = 0;
return bar;
}
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-06 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <57554B8D02000078000F1DE4@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
2016-06-06 8:11 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2016-06-06 8:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen-pciback: clean up read_dev_bar() Jan Beulich
2016-06-06 8:47 ` [PATCH 3/2] xen-pciback: drop rom_init() Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <57554C5D02000078000F1DF1@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
2016-06-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen-pciback: return proper values during BAR sizing Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-06 13:51 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <57559C1D02000078000F20DF@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
2016-06-06 14:28 ` Boris Ostrovsky
[not found] ` <57554C7502000078000F1DF5@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
2016-06-06 13:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen-pciback: clean up read_dev_bar() Boris Ostrovsky
[not found] ` <575554CC02000078000F1E3F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
2016-06-06 13:09 ` [PATCH 3/2] xen-pciback: drop rom_init() Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-06 13:54 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <57559CBD02000078000F20EC@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
2016-06-06 14:35 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='57554C5D02000078000F1DF1__23615.0441146039$1465200776$gmane$org@prv-mh.provo.novell.com' \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=JGross@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).