From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
roger.pau@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen-blkfront: don't call talk_to_blkback when already connected to blkback
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 14:46:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5757BF4E.9080307__36224.882832221$1465368545$gmane$org@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160607152524.GA10281@localhost.localdomain>
On 06/07/2016 11:25 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 01:49:23PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
>>
>> On 06/01/2016 04:33 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:59:16PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
>>>> Sometimes blkfont may receive twice blkback_changed() notification after
>>>> migration, then talk_to_blkback() will be called twice too and confused
>>>> xen-blkback.
>>>
>>> Could you enlighten the patch description by having some form of
>>> state transition here? I am curious how you got the frontend
>>> to get in XenbusStateConnected (via blkif_recover right) and then
>>> the backend triggering the update once more?
>>>
>>> Or is just a simple race - the backend moves from XenbusStateConnected->
>>> XenbusStateConnected - which retriggers the frontend to hit in
>>> blkback_changed the XenbusStateConnected state and go in there?
>>> (That would be in conenct_ring changing the state). But I don't
>>> see how the frontend_changed code get there as we have:
>>>
>>> 770 /*
>>> 771 * Ensure we connect even when two watches fire in
>>> 772 * close succession and we miss the intermediate value
>>> 773 * of frontend_state.
>>> 774 */
>>> 775 if (dev->state == XenbusStateConnected)
>>> 776 break;
>>> 777
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Now what about 'blkfront_connect' being called on the second time?
>>>
>>> Ah, info->connected is probably by then in BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED
>>> (as blkif_recover changed) and we just reread the size of the disk.
>>>
>>> Is that how about the flow goes?
>>
>> blkfront blkback
>> blkfront_resume()
>> > talk_to_blkback()
>> > Set blkfront to XenbusStateInitialised
>> Front changed()
>> > Connect()
>> > Set blkback to XenbusStateConnected
>>
>> blkback_changed()
>> > Skip talk_to_blkback()
>> because frontstate == XenbusStateInitialised
>> > blkfront_connect()
>> > Set blkfront to XenbusStateConnected
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> But sometimes blkfront receives
>> blkback_changed() event more than once!
>
> I think I know why. The udev scripts that get invoked when when
> we attach a disk are a bit custom. As such I think they just
> revalidate the size leading to this.
>
> And this 'poke-at-XenbusStateConnected' state multiple times
> is allowed. It is used to signal disk changes (or just to revalidate).
> Hence it does not matter why really - we need to deal with this.
>
> I modified your patch a bit and are testing it:
>
Looks much better, thank you very much!
Bob
> From e49dc9fc65eda4923b41d903ac51a7ddee182bcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 10:43:15 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: don't call talk_to_blkback when already
> connected to blkback
>
> Sometimes blkfront may twice receive blkback_changed() notification
> (XenbusStateConnected) after migration, which will cause
> talk_to_blkback() to be called twice too and confuse xen-blkback.
>
> The flow is as follow:
> blkfront blkback
> blkfront_resume()
> > talk_to_blkback()
> > Set blkfront to XenbusStateInitialised
> front changed()
> > Connect()
> > Set blkback to XenbusStateConnected
>
> blkback_changed()
> > Skip talk_to_blkback()
> because frontstate == XenbusStateInitialised
> > blkfront_connect()
> > Set blkfront to XenbusStateConnected
>
> -----
> And here we get another XenbusStateConnected notification leading
> to:
> -----
> blkback_changed()
> > because now frontstate != XenbusStateInitialised
> talk_to_blkback() is also called again
> > blkfront state changed from
> XenbusStateConnected to XenbusStateInitialised
> (Which is not correct!)
>
> front_changed():
> > Do nothing because blkback
> already in XenbusStateConnected
>
> Now blkback is in XenbusStateConnected but blkfront is still
> in XenbusStateInitialised - leading to no disks.
>
> Poking of the XenbusStateConnected state is allowed (to deal with
> block disk change) and has to be dealt with. The most likely
> cause of this bug are custom udev scripts hooking up the disks
> and then validating the size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> index b4b8fbd..7765ad5 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> @@ -2484,10 +2484,23 @@ static void blkback_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> break;
>
> case XenbusStateConnected:
> - if (dev->state != XenbusStateInitialised) {
> + /*
> + * talk_to_blkback sets state to XenbusStateInitialised
> + * and blkfront_connect sets it to XenbusStateConnected
> + * (if connection went OK).
> + *
> + * If the backend (or toolstack) decides to poke at backend
> + * state (and re-trigger the watch by setting the state repeatedly
> + * to XenbusStateConnected (4)) we need to deal with this.
> + * This is allowed as this is used to communicate to the guest
> + * that the size of disk has changed!
> + */
> + if ((dev->state != XenbusStateInitialised) &&
> + (dev->state != XenbusStateConnected)) {
> if (talk_to_blkback(dev, info))
> break;
> }
> +
> blkfront_connect(info);
> break;
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1464685157-30738-1-git-send-email-bob.liu@oracle.com>
2016-05-31 8:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen-blkfront: fix resume issues Bob Liu
2016-05-31 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen-blkfront: don't call talk_to_blkback when already connected to blkback Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
[not found] ` <20160531203307.GC23808@char.us.oracle.com>
2016-06-01 5:49 ` Bob Liu
[not found] ` <574E7763.9060001@oracle.com>
2016-06-02 14:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-07 15:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
[not found] ` <20160607152524.GA10281@localhost.localdomain>
2016-06-08 6:46 ` Bob Liu [this message]
[not found] ` <5757BF4E.9080307@oracle.com>
2016-06-08 14:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
[not found] ` <20160608144739.GD17027@char.us.oracle.com>
2016-06-15 8:39 ` Ross Lagerwall
[not found] ` <57611424.2020802@citrix.com>
2016-06-15 14:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-05-31 8:59 Bob Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='5757BF4E.9080307__36224.882832221$1465368545$gmane$org@oracle.com' \
--to=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).