From: Philipp Hahn <hahn@univention.de>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
Cc: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@citrix.com>,
"Nico Stöckigt" <Stoeckigt@univention.de>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <Xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [xen-4.1.6.1] SIGSEGV libxc/xc_save_domain.c: p2m_size >> configured_ram_size
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:14:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <575E9594.9010708@univention.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLBxZbfhrZY=RSZ0NEwLu2vvAfKNtvS0=BgHFWuYAEmnA+O4g@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Georg,
first of all thank you for answering.
Am 13.06.2016 um 12:15 schrieb George Dunlap:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Philipp Hahn <hahn@univention.de> wrote:
>> while trying to live migrate some VMs from an xen-4.1.6.1 host "xc_save"
>> crashes with a segmentation fault in tools/libxc/xc_domain_save.c:1141
>>> /*
>>> * Quick belt and braces sanity check.
>>> */
>>> for ( i = 0; i < dinfo->p2m_size; i++ )
>>> {
>>> mfn = pfn_to_mfn(i);
>>> if( (mfn != INVALID_P2M_ENTRY) && (mfn_to_pfn(mfn) != i) )
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> due to a de-reference through
>>> #define pfn_to_mfn(_pfn) \
>>> ((xen_pfn_t) ((dinfo->guest_width==8) \
>>> ? (((uint64_t *)ctx->live_p2m)[(_pfn)]) \
>>> : ((((uint32_t *)ctx->live_p2m)[(_pfn)]) == 0xffffffffU \
>>> ? (-1UL) : (((uint32_t *)ctx->live_p2m)[(_pfn)]))))
...
> Given that 4.1 is long out of support, we won't be making a proper fix
> in-tree (since it will never be released).
I know that 4.1 is EOL.
I'm aware of Ubuntu still having xen-4.1 in one of their LTS versions
(Precise) and its also in Debian-oldstable, which a lot people (us
included) still use. I would prefer to update, but I can for reasons
outside my direct control.
I'm already working with Stefan Bader from Canonical to backport most of
the XSAs to 4.1, so there already exists a "better" version outside of
the official Xen repositories.
> So what kind of resolution
> would be the most help to you? A patch you can apply locally to allow
> the save/restore to work?
A patch is okay. I've already fixed a lot other bugs in xen-4.1 by
patching the last release, so compiling my own version is no problem for me.
Philipp
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-10 15:22 [xen-4.1.6.1] SIGSEGV libxc/xc_save_domain.c: p2m_size >> configured_ram_size Philipp Hahn
2016-06-13 10:15 ` George Dunlap
2016-06-13 11:14 ` Philipp Hahn [this message]
2016-06-17 9:31 ` Xen 4.1 maintenance? (Was Re: [xen-4.1.6.1] SIGSEGV libxc/xc_save_domain.c: p2m_size >> configured_ram_size) George Dunlap
2016-06-29 9:46 ` Stefan Bader
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=575E9594.9010708@univention.de \
--to=hahn@univention.de \
--cc=Stoeckigt@univention.de \
--cc=Xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).