From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@citrix.com>,
MengXu <mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: dependences for backporting to 4.6 [was: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xen: Have schedulers revise initial placement]
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:21:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57B3135F0200007800106511@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471342864.6806.11.camel@citrix.com>
>>> On 16.08.16 at 12:21, <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 07:53 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Same
>> for 4.5 then, were the backport adjusted for 4.6 then applied
>> cleanly.
>>
> So, you've done the backports yourself, and you don't want/need me to
> do them right?
Indeed.
> I'm asking because that's how I read what you're saying here, but I
> don't see that having happened in staging-{4.5,4.6}. If that's me
> failing to check, or checking in the wrong place, sorry for the noise.
Well, I do things in batches, so these will now simply be part of the
next batch.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-16 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-15 18:02 [PATCH 1/3] xen: Some code motion to avoid having to do forward-declaration George Dunlap
2016-07-15 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen: Have schedulers revise initial placement George Dunlap
2016-07-15 18:07 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-07-16 14:12 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-07-18 18:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-07-18 18:55 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-07-18 21:36 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-07-19 7:14 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-07-18 10:28 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-07-25 11:17 ` George Dunlap
2016-07-25 14:36 ` Meng Xu
2016-07-26 9:17 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-07-25 14:35 ` Meng Xu
2016-08-01 10:40 ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-01 12:32 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-08-05 13:24 ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-05 14:09 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-08-05 14:44 ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-11 14:59 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-08-11 15:51 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-08-11 23:35 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-08-12 1:59 ` dependences for backporting to 4.6 [was: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xen: Have schedulers revise initial placement] Dario Faggioli
2016-08-12 13:53 ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-16 10:21 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-08-16 11:21 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2016-08-12 8:58 ` dependences for backporting to 4.5 " Dario Faggioli
2016-07-15 18:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen: Remove buggy initial placement algorithm George Dunlap
2016-07-15 18:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-07-16 13:55 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-07-18 10:03 ` George Dunlap
2016-07-16 15:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] xen: Some code motion to avoid having to do forward-declaration Meng Xu
2016-07-18 9:58 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-07-18 10:06 ` George Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57B3135F0200007800106511@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=anshul.makkar@citrix.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=mengxu@cis.upenn.edu \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).