xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>,
	Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	StefanoStabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	TimDeegan <tim@xen.org>, Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@citrix.com>,
	IanJackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Euan Harris <euan.harris@citrix.com>,
	JoaoMartins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	PaulC Lai <paul.c.lai@intel.com>
Subject: Re: DESIGN: CPUID part 3
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:18:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <593EBECE0200007800162072@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <607f9093-05ca-c321-8702-cc3bd1795425@citrix.com>

>>> On 12.06.17 at 16:02, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> My original statement was "if the guest uses LBR/LER, then migration
> needs to be restricted to hardware with an identical LBR format".
> 
> You countered that, saying we could emulate LBR/LER as an alternative. 
> The implication here is that we could alter the LBR format via
> emulation, by cooking the value observed when the guest reads the LBR MSRs.
> 
> For the record, the formats are:
> 
> Software should query an architectural MSR IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES[5:0]
> about the format of the address that is stored in the LBR stack. Four
> formats are defined by the following encoding:
> * 000000B (32-bit record format) — Stores 32-bit offset in current CS of
> respective source/destination,
> * 000001B (64-bit LIP record format) — Stores 64-bit linear address of
> respective source/destination,
> * 000010B (64-bit EIP record format) — Stores 64-bit offset (effective
> address) of respective source/destination.
> * 000011B (64-bit EIP record format) and Flags — Stores 64-bit offset
> (effective address) of respective source/destination. Misprediction info
> is reported in the upper bit of 'FROM' registers in the LBR stack. See
> LBR stack details below for flag support and definition.
> * 000100B (64-bit EIP record format), Flags and TSX — Stores 64-bit
> offset (effective address) of respective source/destination.
> Misprediction and TSX info are reported in the upper bits of ‘FROM’
> registers in the LBR stack.
> * 000101B (64-bit EIP record format), Flags, TSX, LBR_INFO — Stores
> 64-bit offset (effective address) of respective source/destination.
> Misprediction, TSX, and elapsed cycles since the last LBR update are
> reported in the LBR_INFO MSR stack.
> * 000110B (64-bit EIP record format), Flags, Cycles — Stores 64-bit
> linear address (CS.Base + effective address) of respective
> source/destination. Misprediction info is reported in the upper bits of
> 17-16 Vol. 3BDEBUG, BRANCH PROFILE, TSC, AND RESOURCE MONITORING
> FEATURES 'FROM' registers in the LBR stack. Elapsed cycles since the
> last LBR update are reported in the upper 16 bits of the 'TO' registers
> in the LBR stack (see Section 17.6).
> 
> In general, I don't see any sensible way of being able to convert
> between these formats at the point of an RDMSR.

Hmm, I don't see a problem converting formats 3..6 to formats 0
or 2. I also don't think any misbehavior can possibly result when
converting 2 to 3 by simply always loading a fixed value into the
mis-prediction bit. Whether 2 can be converted sensibly to 4..6
would need to be determined. Format 1 clearly is the odd one out,
conversion to/from which would only be reasonable if we assumed
flat addressing everywhere (which obviously we can assume as
long as a guest stays in 64-bit mode).

It is also clear that format 6 won't survive the addition of 5-level
page tables, as there aren't enough bits to store a meaningful
cycle count.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-12 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-08 13:12 DESIGN: CPUID part 3 Andrew Cooper
2017-06-08 13:47 ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-12 13:07   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-12 13:29     ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-12 13:36       ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-12 13:42         ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-12 14:02           ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-12 14:18             ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2017-06-09 12:24 ` Anshul Makkar
2017-06-12 13:21   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-07-04 14:55 ` DESIGN v2: " Andrew Cooper
2017-07-05  9:46   ` Joao Martins
2017-07-05 10:32     ` Joao Martins
2017-07-05 11:16     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-07-05 13:22       ` Joao Martins
2017-07-31 19:49         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-08-01 18:34           ` Andrew Cooper
2017-08-02 10:34             ` Joao Martins
2017-08-03  2:55               ` Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=593EBECE0200007800162072@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=anshul.makkar@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=euan.harris@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=paul.c.lai@intel.com \
    --cc=sergey.dyasli@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).