-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Dario,

Thank you for you for your suggestions. I agree, my choice of the word
meaningful was not objective. I will write to the folks at openxt,
consider conducting an evaluation myself, and share the results I get
here.

Thanks,

On 14.06.2017 10:10, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Well, I don't know of any either, but I have never looked. Fact
> is, meaningfulness depends on what each of us needs and actually
> find meaningful. So, it's entirely possible that no one has
> preformed before the specific evaluation you would like to see...
> 
> I think you should: - ask them directly, - begin considering doing
> some evaluation yourself. If you do, we're definitely interested in
> seeing what you will find out.
> 
> Regards, Dario

- -- 
Kashyap Thimmaraju <kashyap.thimmaraju@sec.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
Security in Telecommunications <sec.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
TU Berlin / Telekom Innovation Laboratories
Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, Sekr TEL 16 / D - 10587 Berlin, Germany
Phone: +49 30 8353 58351
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZQPAQAAoJEKEOZw+VIHXNcrcH/0JnplkxmJ8/xCCEx6Co2Vgq
jclTZGu2OpaGWzwEtC8QRsGnNyHQJuFemRoupGnqfKZRIPS+8mH+zbGFHXlfvRKE
0tGNbLdWlNo4zWgvVow3Rl/NvM1s7MJi4nYK9DUNl5PoMLpq3HapclHTwVj8NTzQ
W2LwX6ItU2fmLyv3iJaCblQHkqG6YoRECnbMBs5/VCqGyk7R/VScsqf8Pxx/9fPQ
loE7WMH6785yzvCFCgZOUEEz3iW9t2AjH72AyOSoLgkPRW/sTk91O+Qygdqt0i5n
PxJbw1qZebkfX+5wF0tsNfK0Wh1AbE5xfCFj4nN5J5zZUa7uKP+HGpGKUyFLcyk=
=zQY6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----