Xen-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 04/16] x86/xen: hypercall support for xenhost_t
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:35:23 +0200
Message-ID: <59f7cc19-cd9b-119a-1715-50a947cd995d@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fbfc0a0c-3707-7f17-9f2a-6c9d2c7b05b1@oracle.com>

On 14.06.19 09:20, Ankur Arora wrote:
> On 2019-06-12 2:15 p.m., Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 09/05/2019 18:25, Ankur Arora wrote:
>>> Allow for different hypercall implementations for different xenhost 
>>> types.
>>> Nested xenhost, which has two underlying xenhosts, can use both
>>> simultaneously.
>>>
>>> The hypercall macros (HYPERVISOR_*) implicitly use the default xenhost.x
>>> A new macro (hypervisor_*) takes xenhost_t * as a parameter and does the
>>> right thing.
>>>
>>> TODO:
>>>    - Multicalls for now assume the default xenhost
>>>    - xen_hypercall_* symbols are only generated for the default xenhost.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
>>
>> Again, what is the hypervisor nesting and/or guest layout here?
> Two hypervisors, L0 and L1, and the guest is a child of the L1
> hypervisor but could have PV devices attached to both L0 and L1
> hypervisors.
> 
>>
>> I can't think of any case where a single piece of software can
>> legitimately have two hypercall pages, because if it has one working
>> one, it is by definition a guest, and therefore not privileged enough to
>> use the outer one.
> Depending on which hypercall page is used, the hypercall would
> (eventually) land in the corresponding hypervisor.
> 
> Juergen elsewhere pointed out proxying hypercalls is a better approach,
> so I'm not really considering this any more but, given this layout, and
> assuming that the hypercall pages could be encoded differently would it
> still not work?

Hypercalls might work, but it is a bad idea and a violation of layering
to let a L1 guest issue hypercalls to L0 hypervisor, as those hypercalls
could influence other L1 guests and even the L1 hypervisor.

Hmm, thinking more about it, I even doubt those hypercalls could work in
all cases: when issued from a L1 PV guest the hypercalls would seem to
be issued from user mode for the L0 hypervisor, and this is not allowed.


Juergen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  reply index

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-09 17:25 [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/16] xenhost support Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/16] x86/xen: add xenhost_t interface Ankur Arora
2019-06-07 15:04   ` Juergen Gross
2019-06-11  7:16     ` Ankur Arora
2019-06-14 11:52       ` Juergen Gross
2019-05-09 17:25 ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] x86/xen: cpuid support in xenhost_t Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25   ` [Xen-devel] " Ankur Arora
2019-06-12 21:09   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 03/16] x86/xen: make hypercall_page generic Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] x86/xen: hypercall support for xenhost_t Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Ankur Arora
2019-06-12 21:15   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-14  7:20     ` Ankur Arora
2019-06-14  7:35       ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2019-06-14  8:00         ` Andrew Cooper
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] x86/xen: add feature support in xenhost_t Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 06/16] x86/xen: add shared_info support to xenhost_t Ankur Arora
2019-06-07 15:08   ` Juergen Gross
2019-06-08  5:01     ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] x86/xen: make vcpu_info part of xenhost_t Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25   ` [Xen-devel] " Ankur Arora
2019-06-14 11:53   ` Juergen Gross
2019-06-17  6:28     ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] x86/xen: irq/upcall handling with multiple xenhosts Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Ankur Arora
2019-06-14 12:01   ` Juergen Gross
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] xen/evtchn: support evtchn in xenhost_t Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Ankur Arora
2019-06-14 12:04   ` Juergen Gross
2019-06-17  6:09     ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] xen/balloon: support ballooning " Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Ankur Arora
2019-06-17  9:28   ` Juergen Gross
2019-06-19  2:24     ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] xen/grant-table: make grant-table xenhost aware Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25   ` [Xen-devel] " Ankur Arora
2019-06-17  9:36   ` Juergen Gross
2019-06-19  2:25     ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] xen/xenbus: support xenbus frontend/backend with xenhost_t Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Ankur Arora
2019-06-17  9:50   ` Juergen Gross
2019-06-19  2:38     ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 13/16] drivers/xen: gnttab, evtchn, xenbus API changes Ankur Arora
2019-06-17 10:07   ` Juergen Gross
2019-06-19  2:55     ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 14/16] xen/blk: " Ankur Arora
2019-06-17 10:14   ` Juergen Gross
2019-06-19  2:59     ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] xen/net: " Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Ankur Arora
2019-06-17 10:14   ` Juergen Gross
2019-05-09 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 16/16] xen/grant-table: host_addr fixup in mapping on xenhost_r0 Ankur Arora
2019-06-17 10:55   ` Juergen Gross
2019-06-19  3:02     ` Ankur Arora
2019-05-09 17:25 ` Ankur Arora
2019-06-07 14:51 ` [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/16] xenhost support Juergen Gross
2019-06-07 15:22   ` Joao Martins
2019-06-07 16:21     ` Juergen Gross
2019-06-08  5:50       ` Ankur Arora
2019-06-08  5:33   ` Ankur Arora

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59f7cc19-cd9b-119a-1715-50a947cd995d@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Xen-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/0 xen-devel/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/1 xen-devel/git/1.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 xen-devel xen-devel/ https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel \
		xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org xen-devel@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index xen-devel


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.xenproject.lists.xen-devel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox