xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleksandr <olekstysh@gmail.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
	Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	"paul@xen.org" <paul@xen.org>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 12/16] xen/dm: Introduce xendevicemodel_set_irq_level DM op
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 17:21:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e80bb01-16ab-9801-d065-e197fbca790a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68259658-e6c7-8a80-dbd6-a01b8f0d9a83@xen.org>


On 26.09.20 16:50, Julien Grall wrote:
> (+ Paul and Andre)
>
> Hi,

Hi Julien



>
> Adding Paul as the author of DMOP and Andre as this is GIC related.
>
> On 10/09/2020 21:22, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>> From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>
>
> Looking at the PoC I shared with you, this code was originally written 
> by me.

I am sorry, will fix.


>
>
>>
>> This patch adds ability to the device emulator to notify otherend
>> (some entity running in the guest) using a SPI and implements Arm
>> specific bits for it. Proposed interface allows emulator to set
>> the logical level of a one of a domain's IRQ lines.
>
> It would be good to explain in the commit message why we can't use the 
> existing DMOP to inject an interrupt.

Agree, will explain why the existing DMOP to inject an interrupt is not 
suitable for us.


>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>
>>
>> ---
>> Please note, this is a split/cleanup/hardening of Julien's PoC:
>> "Add support for Guest IO forwarding to a device emulator"
>>
>> Please note, I left interface untouched since there is still
>> an open discussion what interface to use/what information to pass
>> to the hypervisor. The question whether we should abstract away
>> the state of the line or not.
>>
>> Changes RFC -> V1:
>>     - check incoming parameters in arch_dm_op()
>>     - add explicit padding to struct xen_dm_op_set_irq_level
>> ---
>> ---
>>   tools/libs/devicemodel/core.c                   | 18 +++++++++++++
>>   tools/libs/devicemodel/include/xendevicemodel.h |  4 +++
>>   tools/libs/devicemodel/libxendevicemodel.map    |  1 +
>>   xen/arch/arm/dm.c                               | 36 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   xen/common/dm.c                                 |  1 +
>>   xen/include/public/hvm/dm_op.h                  | 15 +++++++++++
>>   6 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/libs/devicemodel/core.c 
>> b/tools/libs/devicemodel/core.c
>> index 4d40639..30bd79f 100644
>> --- a/tools/libs/devicemodel/core.c
>> +++ b/tools/libs/devicemodel/core.c
>> @@ -430,6 +430,24 @@ int xendevicemodel_set_isa_irq_level(
>>       return xendevicemodel_op(dmod, domid, 1, &op, sizeof(op));
>>   }
>>   +int xendevicemodel_set_irq_level(
>> +    xendevicemodel_handle *dmod, domid_t domid, uint32_t irq,
>> +    unsigned int level)
>> +{
>> +    struct xen_dm_op op;
>> +    struct xen_dm_op_set_irq_level *data;
>> +
>> +    memset(&op, 0, sizeof(op));
>> +
>> +    op.op = XEN_DMOP_set_irq_level;
>> +    data = &op.u.set_irq_level;
>> +
>> +    data->irq = irq;
>> +    data->level = level;
>> +
>> +    return xendevicemodel_op(dmod, domid, 1, &op, sizeof(op));
>> +}
>> +
>>   int xendevicemodel_set_pci_link_route(
>>       xendevicemodel_handle *dmod, domid_t domid, uint8_t link, 
>> uint8_t irq)
>>   {
>> diff --git a/tools/libs/devicemodel/include/xendevicemodel.h 
>> b/tools/libs/devicemodel/include/xendevicemodel.h
>> index e877f5c..c06b3c8 100644
>> --- a/tools/libs/devicemodel/include/xendevicemodel.h
>> +++ b/tools/libs/devicemodel/include/xendevicemodel.h
>> @@ -209,6 +209,10 @@ int xendevicemodel_set_isa_irq_level(
>>       xendevicemodel_handle *dmod, domid_t domid, uint8_t irq,
>>       unsigned int level);
>>   +int xendevicemodel_set_irq_level(
>> +    xendevicemodel_handle *dmod, domid_t domid, unsigned int irq,
>> +    unsigned int level);
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * This function maps a PCI INTx line to a an IRQ line.
>>    *
>> diff --git a/tools/libs/devicemodel/libxendevicemodel.map 
>> b/tools/libs/devicemodel/libxendevicemodel.map
>> index 561c62d..a0c3012 100644
>> --- a/tools/libs/devicemodel/libxendevicemodel.map
>> +++ b/tools/libs/devicemodel/libxendevicemodel.map
>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ VERS_1.2 {
>>       global:
>>           xendevicemodel_relocate_memory;
>>           xendevicemodel_pin_memory_cacheattr;
>> +        xendevicemodel_set_irq_level;
>>   } VERS_1.1;
>>     VERS_1.3 {
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/dm.c b/xen/arch/arm/dm.c
>> index eb20344..428ef98 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/dm.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/dm.c
>> @@ -15,11 +15,45 @@
>>    */
>>     #include <xen/hypercall.h>
>
> NIT: newline between <xen/*> and <asm/*> includes.

ok


>
>> +#include <asm/vgic.h>
>>     int arch_dm_op(struct xen_dm_op *op, struct domain *d,
>>                  const struct dmop_args *op_args, bool *const_op)
>>   {
>> -    return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +    int rc;
>> +
>> +    switch ( op->op )
>> +    {
>> +    case XEN_DMOP_set_irq_level:
>> +    {
>> +        const struct xen_dm_op_set_irq_level *data =
>> +            &op->u.set_irq_level;
>> +
>> +        /* Only SPIs are supported */
>> +        if ( (data->irq < NR_LOCAL_IRQS) || (data->irq >= 
>> vgic_num_irqs(d)) )
>> +        {
>> +            rc = -EINVAL;
>> +            break;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        if ( data->level != 0 && data->level != 1 )
>> +        {
>> +            rc = -EINVAL;
>> +            break;
>> +        }
>> +
>
> I think we want to check the padding is always 0.

ok


>
>> +
>> +        vgic_inject_irq(d, NULL, data->irq, data->level);
>
> So, this interface will allow the device emulator to raise/lower the 
> line for an HW mapped interrupt. I think this will mess up with the 
> internal state machine.
>
> It would probably be better if a device emulator can only raise/lower 
> the line for non-allocated interrupts (see 
> d->arch.vgic.allocated_irqs). Any thoughts?

I think, it really makes sense. Will add a corresponding check.


>
>
>> +        rc = 0;
>> +        break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    default:
>> +        rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +        break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return rc;
>>   }
>>     /*
>> diff --git a/xen/common/dm.c b/xen/common/dm.c
>> index 060731d..c55e042 100644
>> --- a/xen/common/dm.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/dm.c
>> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ static int dm_op(const struct dmop_args *op_args)
>>           [XEN_DMOP_remote_shutdown]                  = sizeof(struct 
>> xen_dm_op_remote_shutdown),
>>           [XEN_DMOP_relocate_memory]                  = sizeof(struct 
>> xen_dm_op_relocate_memory),
>>           [XEN_DMOP_pin_memory_cacheattr]             = sizeof(struct 
>> xen_dm_op_pin_memory_cacheattr),
>> +        [XEN_DMOP_set_irq_level]                    = sizeof(struct 
>> xen_dm_op_set_irq_level),
>>       };
>>         rc = rcu_lock_remote_domain_by_id(op_args->domid, &d);
>> diff --git a/xen/include/public/hvm/dm_op.h 
>> b/xen/include/public/hvm/dm_op.h
>> index fd00e9d..39567bf 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/public/hvm/dm_op.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/hvm/dm_op.h
>> @@ -417,6 +417,20 @@ struct xen_dm_op_pin_memory_cacheattr {
>>       uint32_t pad;
>>   };
>>   +/*
>> + * XEN_DMOP_set_irq_level: Set the logical level of a one of a domain's
>> + *                         IRQ lines.
>> + * XXX Handle PPIs.
>
> This is a public interface, so it seems a bit strange to leave a TODO 
> in this code.
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if someone will want PPI support soon, but we 
> may be able to defer it if we can easily extend the hypercall.
>
> @Paul, how did you envision to extend DMOP?
>
> Also, is there any plan to add x86 support? If not, then I think we 
> want to document in the interface that this is Arm only.

I don't have a plan to add x86 support. Will clarify that it is for ARM 
only.


>
>> + */
>> +#define XEN_DMOP_set_irq_level 19
>> +
>> +struct xen_dm_op_set_irq_level {
>> +    uint32_t irq;
>> +    /* IN - Level: 0 -> deasserted, 1 -> asserted */
>> +    uint8_t level;
>> +    uint8_t pad[3];
>> +};
>> +
>>   struct xen_dm_op {
>>       uint32_t op;
>>       uint32_t pad;
>> @@ -430,6 +444,7 @@ struct xen_dm_op {
>>           struct xen_dm_op_track_dirty_vram track_dirty_vram;
>>           struct xen_dm_op_set_pci_intx_level set_pci_intx_level;
>>           struct xen_dm_op_set_isa_irq_level set_isa_irq_level;
>> +        struct xen_dm_op_set_irq_level set_irq_level;
>>           struct xen_dm_op_set_pci_link_route set_pci_link_route;
>>           struct xen_dm_op_modified_memory modified_memory;
>>           struct xen_dm_op_set_mem_type set_mem_type;
>>
>
> Cheers,
>
-- 
Regards,

Oleksandr Tyshchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-26 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-10 20:21 [PATCH V1 00/16] IOREQ feature (+ virtio-mmio) on Arm Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-10 20:21 ` [PATCH V1 01/16] x86/ioreq: Prepare IOREQ feature for making it common Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-14 13:52   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-21 12:22     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-21 12:31       ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-21 12:47         ` Oleksandr
2020-09-21 13:29           ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-21 14:43             ` Oleksandr
2020-09-21 15:28               ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-23 17:22   ` Julien Grall
2020-09-23 18:08     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-10 20:21 ` [PATCH V1 02/16] xen/ioreq: Make x86's IOREQ feature common Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-14 14:17   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-21 19:02     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-22  6:33       ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-22  9:58         ` Oleksandr
2020-09-22 10:54           ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-22 15:05             ` Oleksandr
2020-09-22 15:52               ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-23 12:28                 ` Oleksandr
2020-09-24 10:58                   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-24 15:38                     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-24 15:51                       ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-24 18:01   ` Julien Grall
2020-09-25  8:19     ` Paul Durrant
2020-09-30 13:39       ` Oleksandr
2020-09-30 17:47         ` Julien Grall
2020-10-01  6:59           ` Paul Durrant
2020-10-01  8:49           ` Jan Beulich
2020-10-01  8:50             ` Paul Durrant
2020-09-10 20:21 ` [PATCH V1 03/16] xen/ioreq: Make x86's hvm_ioreq_needs_completion() common Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-14 14:59   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-22 16:16     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-23 17:27     ` Julien Grall
2020-09-10 20:21 ` [PATCH V1 04/16] xen/ioreq: Provide alias for the handle_mmio() Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-14 15:10   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-22 16:20     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-23 17:28   ` Julien Grall
2020-09-23 18:17     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-10 20:21 ` [PATCH V1 05/16] xen/ioreq: Make x86's hvm_mmio_first(last)_byte() common Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-14 15:13   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-22 16:24     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-10 20:22 ` [PATCH V1 06/16] xen/ioreq: Make x86's hvm_ioreq_(page/vcpu/server) structs common Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-14 15:16   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-14 15:59     ` Julien Grall
2020-09-22 16:33     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-10 20:22 ` [PATCH V1 07/16] xen/dm: Make x86's DM feature common Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-14 15:56   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-22 16:46     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-24 11:03       ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-24 12:47         ` Oleksandr
2020-09-23 17:35   ` Julien Grall
2020-09-23 18:28     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-10 20:22 ` [PATCH V1 08/16] xen/mm: Make x86's XENMEM_resource_ioreq_server handling common Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-10 20:22 ` [PATCH V1 09/16] arm/ioreq: Introduce arch specific bits for IOREQ/DM features Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-11 10:14   ` Oleksandr
2020-09-16  7:51   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-22 17:12     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-23 18:03   ` Julien Grall
2020-09-23 20:16     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-24 11:08       ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-24 16:02         ` Oleksandr
2020-09-24 18:02           ` Oleksandr
2020-09-25  6:51             ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-25  9:47               ` Oleksandr
2020-09-26 13:12             ` Julien Grall
2020-09-26 13:18               ` Oleksandr
2020-09-24 16:51         ` Julien Grall
2020-09-24 17:25       ` Julien Grall
2020-09-24 18:22         ` Oleksandr
2020-09-26 13:21           ` Julien Grall
2020-09-26 14:57             ` Oleksandr
2020-09-10 20:22 ` [PATCH V1 10/16] xen/mm: Handle properly reference in set_foreign_p2m_entry() on Arm Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-16  7:17   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-16  8:50     ` Julien Grall
2020-09-16  8:52       ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-16  8:55         ` Julien Grall
2020-09-22 17:30           ` Oleksandr
2020-09-16  8:08   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-10 20:22 ` [PATCH V1 11/16] xen/ioreq: Introduce hvm_domain_has_ioreq_server() Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-16  8:04   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-16  8:13     ` Paul Durrant
2020-09-16  8:39       ` Julien Grall
2020-09-16  8:43         ` Paul Durrant
2020-09-22 18:39           ` Oleksandr
2020-09-22 18:23     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-10 20:22 ` [PATCH V1 12/16] xen/dm: Introduce xendevicemodel_set_irq_level DM op Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-26 13:50   ` Julien Grall
2020-09-26 14:21     ` Oleksandr [this message]
2020-09-10 20:22 ` [PATCH V1 13/16] xen/ioreq: Make x86's invalidate qemu mapcache handling common Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-16  8:50   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-22 19:32     ` Oleksandr
2020-09-24 11:16       ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-24 16:45         ` Oleksandr
2020-09-25  7:03           ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-25 13:05             ` Oleksandr
2020-10-02  9:55               ` Oleksandr
2020-10-07 10:38                 ` Julien Grall
2020-10-07 12:01                   ` Oleksandr
2020-09-10 20:22 ` [PATCH V1 14/16] xen/ioreq: Use guest_cmpxchg64() instead of cmpxchg() Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-16  9:04   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-16  9:07     ` Julien Grall
2020-09-16  9:09       ` Paul Durrant
2020-09-16  9:12         ` Julien Grall
2020-09-22 20:05           ` Oleksandr
2020-09-23 18:12             ` Julien Grall
2020-09-23 20:29               ` Oleksandr
2020-09-16  9:07     ` Paul Durrant
2020-09-23 18:05   ` Julien Grall
2020-09-10 20:22 ` [PATCH V1 15/16] libxl: Introduce basic virtio-mmio support on Arm Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2020-09-10 20:22 ` [PATCH V1 16/16] [RFC] libxl: Add support for virtio-disk configuration Oleksandr Tyshchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5e80bb01-16ab-9801-d065-e197fbca790a@gmail.com \
    --to=olekstysh@gmail.com \
    --cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).