From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@amd.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"Anthony PERARD" <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CI: Add Ocaml to the alpine containers
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 17:31:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <600bacc4-3569-10e8-0c09-d6b855c0512e@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2dcb05a1-d408-e9f3-1108-a155dc3312ff@amd.com>
On 09/06/2023 5:21 pm, Michal Orzel wrote:
> On 09/06/2023 18:02, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> This gets more coverage of optional parts of the build, and makes it easier to
>> trial Ocaml related changes in the smoke tests.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>> ---
>> CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
>> CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
>> CC: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@amd.com>
>> CC: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
>>
>> Hacked up manually to fix the Ocaml bindings for arm64:
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/andyhhp/xen/-/pipelines/895162017
>>
>> but this aspect should be done irrespective.
>> ---
>> automation/build/alpine/3.12-arm64v8.dockerfile | 2 ++
>> automation/build/alpine/3.12.dockerfile | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/automation/build/alpine/3.12-arm64v8.dockerfile b/automation/build/alpine/3.12-arm64v8.dockerfile
>> index 3f1e6a3fc6df..1be3bf780509 100644
>> --- a/automation/build/alpine/3.12-arm64v8.dockerfile
>> +++ b/automation/build/alpine/3.12-arm64v8.dockerfile
>> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ RUN apk --no-cache add \
>> make \
>> musl-dev \
>> ncurses-dev \
>> + ocaml \
>> + ocaml-findlib \
> I can see that in your CI pipeline, this package is missing. Is it then necessary to be added?
> Asking just out of curiosity because other containers have it installed too.
>
> Apart from that, I can confirm that containers can be built without issues, so:
> Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@amd.com>
Thanks. It is necessary, yes.
I missed it the first time around, and deployed updated container to
rerun the failed job, rather than pushing a full new branch.
I'm unsure why the opensuse containers have ocaml-ocamlbuild and
ocaml-ocamldoc too, but that can be a mystery for another day.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-09 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-09 16:02 [PATCH] CI: Add Ocaml to the alpine containers Andrew Cooper
2023-06-09 16:21 ` Michal Orzel
2023-06-09 16:31 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2023-06-09 17:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=600bacc4-3569-10e8-0c09-d6b855c0512e@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=michal.orzel@amd.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).