From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF50DC47437 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:51:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 329E121972 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:32:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 329E121972 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.43656.78487 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kkpet-000483-6o; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:32:35 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 43656.78487; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:32:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kkpet-00047u-3N; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:32:35 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 43656; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:32:33 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kkper-00047f-5L for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:32:33 +0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.15]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 5f7de066-6fba-487a-822d-6fce65ccd27b; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2E9ABE9; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:32:31 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 5f7de066-6fba-487a-822d-6fce65ccd27b X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1607005951; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=D590jycdEqjmqOLf5UnHRlb2s9jIT0LQnoieX8G9a+0=; b=gf7kiDQkuPQi8T2d1GxRwF9QKoicFnQWwpGlls3mvUKES0wCtEnie23zN9fe1jmCMOoSXu RXyAdNr6sJd3uRDC0yLuFJWSUs3O8AUhXsNDal1PiGSqwXOv5W/WSe6k/EdfQYOBDfLp47 07oGw1ybrh1WL28LhfE9mSii+xgxjqQ= Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Call for agenda items for December 2020 Community Call @ 16:00 UTC To: George Dunlap Cc: "open list:X86" References: <6A1AC739-EB53-4996-A99B-EE68358E70DB@citrix.com> <6da4cd56-7364-bc6e-24d8-02976dbd637d@suse.com> <49AA35F9-5056-4D42-AE1D-5A478B0CDF7B@citrix.com> From: Jan Beulich Message-ID: <6173e857-2486-08b8-e0b1-93b400e8c9ba@suse.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:32:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <49AA35F9-5056-4D42-AE1D-5A478B0CDF7B@citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 30.11.2020 13:16, George Dunlap wrote: >> On Nov 30, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> On 27.11.2020 12:52, George Dunlap wrote: >>> The proposed agenda is in https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/OPN55rXaOncupuWuHxtddzWJ/ and you can edit to add items. Alternatively, you can reply to this mail directly. >> >> The "New series / series requiring attention" section is gone. Was >> this intentional? If not, I would have wanted to propose that items >> from that list which we didn't get to on the previous call be >> automatically propagated. According to my observation it is more >> likely than not that nothing would have changed in their status. >> Hence it may be easier to take one off the list if indeed it has >> got unstalled. > > Oops — I meant to delete the content, but not the header. > > Hopefully “not getting to that part of the call” should be rare; but yes, copying it over (perhaps with a color to indicate that it’s been carried over from last time) sounds reasonable. I’ll do that. Seeing that it didn't happen for today's meeting, I've blindly copied over the previous meeting's section, before adding new items there. Jan