From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/pci: try to reserve MCFG areas earlier
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:55:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64d52960-28d5-fb23-8892-35c9d4ed9d90@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <416ff4b7-3186-f61a-75fa-bcfc968f8117@citrix.com>
On 10.09.2019 11:46, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> On 10/09/2019 02:47, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 9/9/19 5:48 PM, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>>> Actually, pci_mmcfg_late_init() that's called out of acpi_init() -
>>> that's where MCFG areas are properly sized.
>>
>> pci_mmcfg_late_init() reads the (static) MCFG, which doesn't need DSDT parsing, does it? setup_mcfg_map() OTOH does need it as it uses data from _CBA (or is it _CRS?), and I think that's why we can't parse MCFG prior to acpi_init(). So what I said above indeed won't work.
>>
>
> No, it uses is_acpi_reserved() (it's called indirectly so might be well
> hidden) to parse DSDT to find a reserved resource in it and size MCFG
> area accordingly. setup_mcfg_map() is called for every root bus
> discovered and indeed tries to evaluate _CBA but at this point
> pci_mmcfg_late_init() has already finished MCFG registration for every
> cold-plugged bus (which information is described in MCFG table) so those
> calls are dummy.
I don't think they're strictly dummy. Even for boot time available devices
iirc there's no strict requirement for there to be respective data in MCFG.
Such a requirement exists only for devices which are actually needed to
start the OS (disk or network, perhaps video or alike), or maybe even just
its loader.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-10 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-04 0:20 [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/pci: try to reserve MCFG areas earlier Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-04 9:08 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-04 11:36 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-04 12:09 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-06 22:30 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-06 23:00 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-08 18:28 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-08 21:11 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-08 23:30 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-08 23:37 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-09 19:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-09 21:48 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 1:47 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-10 9:46 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 9:55 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2019-09-10 10:08 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 17:48 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-10 20:36 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 21:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-11 1:15 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-11 9:13 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-12 17:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=64d52960-28d5-fb23-8892-35c9d4ed9d90@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=igor.druzhinin@citrix.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).