From: Rahul Singh <Rahul.Singh@arm.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com>,
Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
"brian.woods@xilinx.com" <brian.woods@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Generic SMMU Bindings
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:43:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6992A3B8-0DB6-4A62-8B6F-1F59FF004A52@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2104061606080.31460@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s>
Hi Stefano,
> On 7 Apr 2021, at 12:59 am, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 26/01/2021 22:58, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>>> This series introduces support for the generic SMMU bindings to
>>> xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c.
>>>
>>> The last version of the series was
>>> https://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=159539053406643
>> Some changes in the SMMU drivers went in recently. I believe this touched
>> similar area to this series. Would you be able to check that this series still
>> work as intented?
>
> Thanks for the heads up, no, unfortunately they don't work :-(
>
> They badly clash. I did the forward port of the three patches but they
> fail at runtime in my tests. I ran out of time to figure out what is the
> problem, and I'll have to pick it up at some point in the future (it
> might not be any time soon unfortunately).
>
> Rahul, if you have any ideas about what the problem is please let me
> know. This is the branch with the forward port:
Let me check and come back to you if I found out anything regarding the same.
Regards,
Rahul
>
> http://xenbits.xenproject.org/git-http/people/sstabellini/xen-unstable.git smmu-generic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-07 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-26 22:58 [PATCH v3 0/3] Generic SMMU Bindings Stefano Stabellini
2021-01-26 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] arm,smmu: switch to using iommu_fwspec functions Stefano Stabellini
2021-02-02 16:07 ` Rahul Singh
2021-01-26 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm,smmu: restructure code in preparation to new bindings support Stefano Stabellini
2021-02-02 16:09 ` Rahul Singh
2021-01-26 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm,smmu: add support for generic DT bindings. Implement add_device and dt_xlate Stefano Stabellini
2021-02-02 16:09 ` Rahul Singh
2021-02-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Generic SMMU Bindings Rahul Singh
2021-02-02 17:44 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-02-02 17:50 ` Julien Grall
2021-02-02 18:27 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-02-02 18:43 ` Julien Grall
2021-02-03 17:14 ` Rahul Singh
2021-04-05 15:23 ` Julien Grall
2021-04-06 23:59 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-04-07 15:43 ` Rahul Singh [this message]
2021-04-10 0:27 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-04-12 10:20 ` Rahul Singh
2021-04-13 0:27 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-04-14 10:42 ` Rahul Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6992A3B8-0DB6-4A62-8B6F-1F59FF004A52@arm.com \
--to=rahul.singh@arm.com \
--cc=Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com \
--cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
--cc=brian.woods@xilinx.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).