From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <Oleksandr_Andrushchenko@epam.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "julien@xen.org" <julien@xen.org>,
"sstabellini@kernel.org" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <Oleksandr_Tyshchenko@epam.com>,
Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
Artem Mygaiev <Artem_Mygaiev@epam.com>,
"roger.pau@citrix.com" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
"andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"george.dunlap@citrix.com" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
"paul@xen.org" <paul@xen.org>,
Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@arm.com>,
Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@arm.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/11] vpci/header: implement guest BAR register handlers
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 12:46:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c61bd19-228a-fc12-eb64-00c8c5340292@epam.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44a22c22-62aa-d04f-cc43-d7a64cedbe15@suse.com>
On 19.11.21 14:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 13:10, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 19.11.21 13:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>>> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add relevant vpci register handlers when assigning PCI device to a domain
>>>> and remove those when de-assigning. This allows having different
>>>> handlers for different domains, e.g. hwdom and other guests.
>>>>
>>>> Emulate guest BAR register values: this allows creating a guest view
>>>> of the registers and emulates size and properties probe as it is done
>>>> during PCI device enumeration by the guest.
>>>>
>>>> ROM BAR is only handled for the hardware domain and for guest domains
>>>> there is a stub: at the moment PCI expansion ROM is x86 only, so it
>>>> might not be used by other architectures without emulating x86. Other
>>>> use-cases may include using that expansion ROM before Xen boots, hence
>>>> no emulation is needed in Xen itself. Or when a guest wants to use the
>>>> ROM code which seems to be rare.
>>> At least in the initial days of EFI there was the concept of EFI byte
>>> code, for ROM code to be compiled to such that it would be arch-
>>> independent. While I don't mean this to be an argument against leaving
>>> out ROM BAR handling for now, this may want mentioning here to avoid
>>> giving the impression that it's only x86 which might be affected by
>>> this deliberate omission.
>> I can put:
>> at the moment PCI expansion ROM handling is supported for x86 only
>> and it might not be used by other architectures without emulating x86.
> Sounds at least somewhat better to me.
>
>>>> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
>>>> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
>>>> @@ -408,6 +408,48 @@ static void bar_write(const struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int reg,
>>>> pci_conf_write32(pdev->sbdf, reg, val);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static void guest_bar_write(const struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int reg,
>>>> + uint32_t val, void *data)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct vpci_bar *bar = data;
>>>> + bool hi = false;
>>>> +
>>>> + if ( bar->type == VPCI_BAR_MEM64_HI )
>>>> + {
>>>> + ASSERT(reg > PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0);
>>>> + bar--;
>>>> + hi = true;
>>>> + }
>>>> + else
>>>> + {
>>>> + val &= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
>>>> + val |= bar->type == VPCI_BAR_MEM32 ? PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32
>>>> + : PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64;
>>>> + val |= bar->prefetchable ? PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH : 0;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + bar->guest_addr &= ~(0xffffffffull << (hi ? 32 : 0));
>>>> + bar->guest_addr |= (uint64_t)val << (hi ? 32 : 0);
>>>> +
>>>> + bar->guest_addr &= ~(bar->size - 1) | ~PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static uint32_t guest_bar_read(const struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int reg,
>>>> + void *data)
>>>> +{
>>>> + const struct vpci_bar *bar = data;
>>>> + bool hi = false;
>>>> +
>>>> + if ( bar->type == VPCI_BAR_MEM64_HI )
>>>> + {
>>>> + ASSERT(reg > PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0);
>>>> + bar--;
>>>> + hi = true;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return bar->guest_addr >> (hi ? 32 : 0);
>>> I'm afraid "guest_addr" then isn't the best name; maybe "guest_val"?
>>> This would make more obvious that there is a meaningful difference
>>> from "addr" besides the guest vs host aspect.
>> I am not sure I can agree here:
>> bar->addr and bar->guest_addr make it clear what are these while
>> bar->addr and bar->guest_val would make someone go look for
>> additional information about what that val is for.
> Feel free to replace "val" with something more suitable. "guest_bar"
> maybe? The value definitely is not an address, so "addr" seems
> inappropriate / misleading to me.
This is a guest's view on the BAR's address. So to me it is still guest_addr
>
> Jan
>
Thank you,
Oleksandr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-19 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-05 6:56 [PATCH v4 00/11] PCI devices passthrough on Arm, part 3 Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-05 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] vpci: fix function attributes for vpci_process_pending Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-05 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] vpci: cancel pending map/unmap on vpci removal Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-15 16:56 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-16 7:32 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-16 8:01 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-16 8:23 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-16 11:38 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-16 13:27 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-16 14:11 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-16 13:41 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-16 14:12 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-16 14:24 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-16 14:37 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-16 16:09 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-16 18:02 ` Julien Grall
2021-11-18 12:57 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-17 8:28 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-18 7:49 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-18 8:36 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-18 8:54 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-18 9:15 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-18 9:32 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-18 13:25 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-18 13:48 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-18 14:04 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-11-18 14:14 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-18 14:35 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-18 15:11 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-18 15:16 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-18 15:21 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-18 15:41 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-18 15:46 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-18 15:53 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 12:34 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 13:00 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 13:16 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 13:25 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 13:34 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-22 14:21 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-22 14:37 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-22 14:45 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-22 14:57 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-22 15:02 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-05 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] vpci: make vpci registers removal a dedicated function Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-15 16:57 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-16 8:02 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-05 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] vpci: add hooks for PCI device assign/de-assign Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-15 17:06 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-16 9:38 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-05 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] vpci/header: implement guest BAR register handlers Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 11:58 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 12:10 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 12:37 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 12:46 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko [this message]
2021-11-19 12:49 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 12:54 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 13:02 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 13:17 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-23 15:14 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-24 12:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-11-24 12:36 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-05 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] vpci/header: handle p2m range sets per BAR Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 12:05 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 12:13 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 12:45 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 12:50 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 13:06 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 13:19 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 13:29 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 13:38 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 13:16 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 13:41 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 13:57 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 14:09 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-22 8:24 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-22 8:31 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-05 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] vpci/header: program p2m with guest BAR view Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 12:33 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 12:44 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-05 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] vpci/header: emulate PCI_COMMAND register for guests Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-05 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] vpci/header: reset the command register when adding devices Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-05 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] vpci: add initial support for virtual PCI bus topology Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-18 16:45 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-24 11:28 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-24 12:36 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-11-24 12:43 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-05 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] xen/arm: translate virtual PCI bus topology for guests Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-08 11:10 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-08 11:16 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-08 14:23 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-11-08 15:28 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-24 11:31 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] PCI devices passthrough on Arm, part 3 Jan Beulich
2021-11-19 14:06 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-19 14:23 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-11-19 14:26 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-20 9:47 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-11-22 8:22 ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-22 8:34 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-11-22 8:44 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c61bd19-228a-fc12-eb64-00c8c5340292@epam.com \
--to=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com \
--cc=Artem_Mygaiev@epam.com \
--cc=Oleksandr_Tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=paul@xen.org \
--cc=rahul.singh@arm.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).