xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Stefan ISAILA <aisaila@bitdefender.com>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.lengyel@zentific.com>,
	Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
	Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] x86/mm: Add mem access rights to NPT
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 09:30:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <821c3f9e-698d-7247-a095-6572e73d36d1@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f46782a-66f5-f2c6-4ed1-3e4dc4c7e6a7@citrix.com>

Ping

Suravee / Brian / Boris any ideas on this topic are appreciated.

Regards,
Alex

On 27.09.2018 13:37, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/26/2018 06:22 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 26/09/18 17:47, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> From: Isaila Alexandru <aisaila@bitdefender.com>
>>>
>>> This patch adds access control for NPT mode.
>>>
>>> There aren’t enough extra bits to store the access rights in the NPT p2m
>>> table, so we add a radix tree to store extra information.
>>
>> I'm sorry to re-open this argument, but why?
>>
>> ISTR there being some argument based on pagetable sharing with the
>> IOMMU, but that doesn't work at the moment and can't reasonably be made
>> to work.  For one, attempting to use pt sharing will break as soon as
>> you try and DMA to a mapped grant.
>>
>> I'm disinclined to let a broken vestigial feature get in the way of real
>> improvements.
>>
>> Beyond that, an NPT PTE has basically the same number of software
>> available bits as an EPT PTE.
>>
>> Am I missing anything?
> 
> Wow -- looks like IOMMU/p2m sharing has been disabled unconditionally
> since 2014.  If nobody has complained since then, that seems like a good
> enough reason to me to rip it out.
> 
> Suravee / Brian / Boris -- any opinions?
> 
> The main reason to go with the 'extra bits' solution rather than the
> 'rip out iommu/p2m sharing' solution is because people have been
> prognosticating for years that we would be running out of bits and need
> more at some point in the future.  I thought Paul, for instance, might
> have a use for the extra bits.  But I'm happy to wait until such time as
> we need it and then fish this patch out of the mail archives.
> 
>   -George
> 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-09  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-26 16:47 [RFC PATCH 1/2] mem_access: Fix npfec.kind propagation George Dunlap
2018-09-26 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] x86/mm: Add mem access rights to NPT George Dunlap
2018-09-26 17:22   ` Andrew Cooper
2018-09-27 10:37     ` George Dunlap
2018-09-27 10:53       ` Paul Durrant
2019-01-09  9:30       ` Alexandru Stefan ISAILA [this message]
2018-09-27  9:38   ` Isaila Alexandru
2019-06-13 10:56   ` [Xen-devel] " Alexandru Stefan ISAILA
2019-06-17 10:48     ` George Dunlap
2019-06-17 11:58       ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-13 15:19   ` Tamas Lengyel
2019-06-13 15:21     ` Razvan Cojocaru
2018-09-26 16:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mem_access: Fix npfec.kind propagation Tamas Lengyel
2018-09-26 17:00 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-09-27  7:04   ` Jan Beulich
2018-09-27  8:46     ` George Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=821c3f9e-698d-7247-a095-6572e73d36d1@bitdefender.com \
    --to=aisaila@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=brian.woods@amd.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tamas.lengyel@zentific.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).