xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	"julien.grall@arm.com" <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/7] xen/arm: pass node to device_tree_for_each_node
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 13:45:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h86lgovx.fsf@epam.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190812222844.9636-1-sstabellini@kernel.org>


Hi Stefano,

Stefano Stabellini writes:

> Add a new parameter to device_tree_for_each_node: node, the node to
> start the search from. Passing 0 triggers the old behavior.
>
> Set min_depth to depth of the current node + 1 and replace the for
> loop with a do/while loop to avoid scanning siblings of the initial node
> passed as an argument.
>
> We need this change because in follow-up patches we want to be able to
> use reuse device_tree_for_each_node to call a function for each children
> nodes of a provided node and the node itself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com>

You can have my

Reviewed-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr.babchuk@epam.com>

providing that you'll fix formatting issue below.

> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - go back to v3
> - code style improvement in acpi/boot.c
> - improve comments and commit message
> - increase min_depth to avoid parsing siblings
> - replace for with do/while loop and increase min_depth to avoid
>   scanning siblings of the initial node
> - pass only node, calculate depth
>
> Changes in v3:
> - improve commit message
> - improve in-code comments
> - improve code style
>
> Changes in v2:
> - new
> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/acpi/boot.c      |  8 +++++---
>  xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c        | 19 ++++++++++---------
>  xen/include/xen/device_tree.h |  6 +++---
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/acpi/boot.c b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/boot.c
> index 9b29769a10..d4957cca06 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -246,9 +246,11 @@ int __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
>       * - the device tree is not empty (it has more than just a /chosen node)
>       *   and ACPI has not been force enabled (acpi=force)
>       */
> -    if ( param_acpi_off || ( !param_acpi_force
> -                             && device_tree_for_each_node(device_tree_flattened,
> -                                                   dt_scan_depth1_nodes, NULL)))
> +    if ( param_acpi_off)
> +        goto disable;
> +	if ( !param_acpi_force &&
> +		 device_tree_for_each_node(device_tree_flattened, 0,
> +			                       dt_scan_depth1_nodes, NULL) )
There is 3 tabs, followed by spaces.

This file missed emacs magic at the end. I think, this is cause for this
formatting issue.

>          goto disable;
>  
>      /*
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c b/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
> index 891b4b66ff..a872ea57d6 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static u32 __init device_tree_get_u32(const void *fdt, int node,
>  /**
>   * device_tree_for_each_node - iterate over all device tree nodes
>   * @fdt: flat device tree.
> + * @node: node to start the search from
>   * @func: function to call for each node.
>   * @data: data to pass to @func.
>   *
> @@ -85,20 +86,17 @@ static u32 __init device_tree_get_u32(const void *fdt, int node,
>   * Returns 0 if all nodes were iterated over successfully.  If @func
>   * returns a value different from 0, that value is returned immediately.
>   */
> -int __init device_tree_for_each_node(const void *fdt,
> +int __init device_tree_for_each_node(const void *fdt, int node,
>                                       device_tree_node_func func,
>                                       void *data)
>  {
> -    int node;
> -    int depth;
> +    int depth = fdt_node_depth(fdt, node);
> +    int min_depth = depth + 1;
>      u32 address_cells[DEVICE_TREE_MAX_DEPTH];
>      u32 size_cells[DEVICE_TREE_MAX_DEPTH];
>      int ret;
>  
> -    for ( node = 0, depth = 0;
> -          node >=0 && depth >= 0;
> -          node = fdt_next_node(fdt, node, &depth) )
> -    {
> +    do {
>          const char *name = fdt_get_name(fdt, node, NULL);
>          u32 as, ss;
>  
> @@ -120,7 +118,10 @@ int __init device_tree_for_each_node(const void *fdt,
>          ret = func(fdt, node, name, depth, as, ss, data);
>          if ( ret != 0 )
>              return ret;
> -    }
> +
> +        node = fdt_next_node(fdt, node, &depth);
> +    } while ( node >= 0 && depth >= min_depth );
> +
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -357,7 +358,7 @@ size_t __init boot_fdt_info(const void *fdt, paddr_t paddr)
>  
>      add_boot_module(BOOTMOD_FDT, paddr, fdt_totalsize(fdt), false);
>  
> -    device_tree_for_each_node((void *)fdt, early_scan_node, NULL);
> +    device_tree_for_each_node((void *)fdt, 0, early_scan_node, NULL);
>      early_print_info();
>  
>      return fdt_totalsize(fdt);
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h
> index 83156297e2..9a7a8f2dab 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h
> @@ -158,9 +158,9 @@ typedef int (*device_tree_node_func)(const void *fdt,
>  
>  extern const void *device_tree_flattened;
>  
> -int device_tree_for_each_node(const void *fdt,
> -                                     device_tree_node_func func,
> -                                     void *data);
> +int device_tree_for_each_node(const void *fdt, int node,
> +                              device_tree_node_func func,
> +                              void *data);
>  
>  /**
>   * dt_unflatten_host_device_tree - Unflatten the host device tree


-- 
Volodymyr Babchuk at EPAM
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-13 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-12 22:28 [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 0/7] reserved-memory in dom0 Stefano Stabellini
2019-08-12 22:28 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/7] xen/arm: pass node to device_tree_for_each_node Stefano Stabellini
2019-08-13 13:45   ` Volodymyr Babchuk [this message]
2019-08-14 22:12     ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-08-13 17:25   ` Julien Grall
2019-08-14 22:11     ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-08-12 22:28 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 2/7] xen/arm: make process_memory_node a device_tree_node_func Stefano Stabellini
2019-08-13 14:14   ` Volodymyr Babchuk
2019-08-14 22:35     ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-08-15  9:12       ` Julien Grall
2019-08-15 11:20       ` Volodymyr Babchuk
2019-08-15 11:24         ` Julien Grall
2019-08-15 11:29           ` Julien Grall
2019-08-15 12:14             ` Volodymyr Babchuk
2019-08-15 12:33               ` Julien Grall
2019-08-15 13:51                 ` Volodymyr Babchuk
2019-08-15 14:15                   ` Julien Grall
2019-08-13 17:37   ` Julien Grall
2019-08-14 22:54     ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-08-12 22:28 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 3/7] xen/arm: keep track of reserved-memory regions Stefano Stabellini
2019-08-13 14:23   ` Volodymyr Babchuk
2019-08-13 14:46     ` Julien Grall
2019-08-13 15:14       ` Volodymyr Babchuk
2019-08-13 15:15         ` Julien Grall
2019-08-13 15:39           ` Volodymyr Babchuk
2019-08-14 12:48   ` Julien Grall
2019-08-12 22:28 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 4/7] xen/arm: early_print_info print reserved_mem Stefano Stabellini
2019-08-13 14:28   ` Volodymyr Babchuk
2019-08-13 14:47     ` Julien Grall
2019-08-14 22:21       ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-08-14 12:52   ` Julien Grall
2019-08-12 22:28 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 5/7] xen/arm: handle reserved-memory in consider_modules and dt_unreserved_regions Stefano Stabellini
2019-08-12 22:28 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 6/7] xen/arm: don't iomem_permit_access for reserved-memory regions Stefano Stabellini
2019-08-13 14:34   ` Volodymyr Babchuk
2019-08-13 14:55     ` Julien Grall
2019-08-14 22:40       ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-08-15  9:15         ` Julien Grall
2019-08-12 22:28 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 7/7] xen/arm: add reserved-memory regions to the dom0 memory node Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h86lgovx.fsf@epam.com \
    --to=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanos@xilinx.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).