From: "Xu, Quan" <quan.xu@intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "dario.faggioli@citrix.com" <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/11] IOMMU/MMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to iommu_iotlb_flush{, _all} (top level ones)
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 07:02:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28894B8D9701@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D15F8A4C04@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On June 12, 2016 2:56 PM, Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.grall@arm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 8:40 PM
> >
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > On 09/06/16 13:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>>> On 09.06.16 at 14:24, <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote:
> > >> So the behavior of iommu_iotlb_flush is up to the IOMMU driver.
> > >> Whilst the behavior of iommu_{,un}map_page are defined by the
> common code.
> > >
> > > I'm certainly up for moving the logic up to the generic IOMMU layer,
> > > if that's feasible.
> >
> > That would be my preference.
> >
>
> I suppose above comment is for "[Patch v11 0/3] VT-d Device-TLB flush
> issue", where the crash logic better be moved up.
I think so too. however, I am still reading these AMD/ARM related code.
> Do you have further against
> on this patch then?
Quan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-12 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-08 8:58 [PATCH v7 00/11] Check VT-d Device-TLB flush error Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 8:58 ` [PATCH v7 01/11] IOMMU: handle IOMMU mapping and unmapping failures Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 8:58 ` [PATCH v7 02/11] IOMMU/MMU: enhance the call trees of IOMMU unmapping and mapping Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 14:40 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <57584D8602000078000F32D0@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
[not found] ` <421857ad-4f6b-e99c-1e81-034b19effdfb@amd.com>
2016-06-10 6:56 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-12 6:41 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-08 8:58 ` [PATCH v7 03/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to IOMMU unmapping (top level ones) Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 14:42 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-08 14:54 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-09 19:30 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2016-06-09 10:28 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-08 8:58 ` [PATCH v7 04/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to IOMMU mapping " Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 14:43 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-09 18:45 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2016-06-09 10:30 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-08 8:58 ` [PATCH v7 05/11] IOMMU/MMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to iommu_iotlb_flush{, _all} " Xu, Quan
2016-06-09 11:12 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-09 11:45 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-09 12:03 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-09 12:08 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-09 12:15 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-09 12:24 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-09 12:32 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-09 12:39 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-12 6:55 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-12 7:02 ` Xu, Quan [this message]
2016-06-12 15:35 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-09 12:14 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-12 6:46 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-08 8:58 ` [PATCH v7 06/11] propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to EPT update " Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v7 07/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to IOMMU suspending " Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 14:51 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-12 7:42 ` Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 9:25 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-09 18:58 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2016-06-12 6:58 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v7 08/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error (leaf ones) Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v7 09/11] vt-d: fix the IOMMU flush issue Xu, Quan
2016-06-12 7:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-12 9:27 ` Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 8:50 ` Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v7 10/11] vt-d: propagate the IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to ME phantom functions Xu, Quan
2016-06-12 7:34 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v7 11/11] vt-d: add __must_check annotation to IOMMU flush pointers and handlers Xu, Quan
2016-06-12 7:35 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28894B8D9701@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=quan.xu@intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v7 05/11] IOMMU/MMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to iommu_iotlb_flush{, _all} (top level ones)' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).