xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xu, Quan" <quan.xu@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/11] IOMMU/MMU: enhance the call trees of IOMMU unmapping and mapping
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 08:35:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28894B8E5E56@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D15F8B5AFF@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On June 15, 2016 4:22 PM, Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Xu, Quan
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 4:16 PM
> >
> > On June 15, 2016 3:45 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> > > >>> On 15.06.16 at 03:54, <quan.xu@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > Jan,
> > > > Could you help me review patch 7?   Thanks.
> > > > Then, I can send out next v9 soon and get started to focus on next
> > > > patch set.
> > >
> > > That patch is fine now from my pov, feel free to stick my R-b on it.
> > > I actually have it queued for committing already, pending an ARM ack
> > > for patch 4 (which is why yesterday I committed only the first three
> > > patches of that series); I didn't check yet which other acks may
> > > still be missing on later patches, everything up to patch 8 is ready
> > > to go in afaic, pending all necessary acks are in place.
> > >
> >
> > Jan,
> > thanks very much!!
> > For patch 4, I will ping arm maintainer in that email.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kevin,
> >     For patch 9, could you help me review it?  With your reply of
> > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-
> 06/msg01842.html  ,
> >    there is no issue doing so based on spec. I think what I do is
> > changing ' iommu_rc / iommu_ret '  to ' context_rc / iotlb_rc '.
> >    in this case, I wonder whether this can be fixed upon commit, then
> > I am no need to send out v9.
> >
> 
> Yes, no more comments except the naming:
> 
> Acked-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> 

Jan,
If there are no other problem, could you help me fix these naming issue upon commit?  
Also for the comments,  you can change them as you like.

Quan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-15  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-13 15:17 [PATCH v8 00/11] Check VT-d Device-TLB flush error Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] IOMMU: handle IOMMU mapping and unmapping failures Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 02/11] IOMMU/MMU: enhance the call trees of IOMMU unmapping and mapping Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 15:36   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-13 16:36   ` George Dunlap
2016-06-15  1:54     ` Xu, Quan
2016-06-15  7:44       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15  8:15         ` Xu, Quan
2016-06-15  8:22           ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-15  8:35             ` Xu, Quan [this message]
2016-06-15  8:42               ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15  8:53                 ` Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 03/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to IOMMU unmapping (top level ones) Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 04/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to IOMMU mapping " Xu, Quan
2016-06-15  8:26   ` Xu, Quan
2016-06-16  9:19   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-13 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 05/11] IOMMU/MMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to iommu_iotlb_flush{, _all} " Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 06/11] propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to EPT update " Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 16:37   ` George Dunlap
2016-06-13 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 07/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to IOMMU suspending " Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 08/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error (leaf ones) Xu, Quan
2016-06-16  9:25   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-13 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 09/11] vt-d: fix the IOMMU flush issue Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 15:52   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-14  8:10     ` Xu, Quan
2016-06-14  8:26       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-14  9:04         ` Xu, Quan
2016-06-15  1:42           ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-13 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 10/11] vt-d: propagate the IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to ME phantom functions Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 11/11] vt-d: add __must_check annotation to IOMMU flush pointers and handlers Xu, Quan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28894B8E5E56@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=quan.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).