xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	"Rahul Singh" <rahul.singh@arm.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, bertrand.marquis@arm.com,
	Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	Ian Jackson <iwj@xenproject.org>, Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] xen/pci: Refactor MSI code that implements MSI functionality within XEN
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:11:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <976e133f-ee94-8a2a-bc50-ebed50e2bd71@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YIlBnQO+iuFFx2XO@Air-de-Roger>

On 28.04.2021 13:06, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 05:21:27PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> MSI code that implements MSI functionality to support MSI within XEN is
>> not usable on ARM. Move the code under CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT flag to
>> gate the code for ARM.
>>
>> Currently, we have no idea how MSI functionality will be supported for
>> other architecture therefore we have decided to move the code under
>> CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT. We know this is not the right flag to gate the
>> code but to avoid an extra flag we decided to use this.
>>
>> No functional change intended.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@arm.com>
> 
> I think this is fine, as we don't really want to add another Kconfig
> option (ie: CONFIG_PCI_MSI) for just the non explicitly intercept MSI
> code.

While a separate config option may be excessive, keying it to the
wrong one is not desirable imo. If we want to avoid having PCI_MSI,
then keeping respective bits guarded by X86 would look better to me.
I'm not convinced though that doing the separation properly right
away (see also the XSM changes in patch 2 which imo belong here)
isn't going to be better in the long run, and hence introducing
HAS_PCI_MSI right away isn't the way to go.

Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-28 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-26 16:21 [PATCH v3 0/3] xen/pci: Make PCI passthrough code non-x86 specific Rahul Singh
2021-04-26 16:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] xen/iommu: Move iommu_update_ire_from_msi(..) to xen/iommu.h Rahul Singh
2021-04-27 15:58   ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-26 16:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] xen/pci: Refactor PCI MSI intercept related code Rahul Singh
2021-04-28 10:42   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-28 13:57     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-29  8:27       ` Rahul Singh
2021-04-29  8:23     ` Rahul Singh
2021-04-28 14:06   ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-29 11:31     ` Rahul Singh
2021-04-29 11:47       ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-26 16:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] xen/pci: Refactor MSI code that implements MSI functionality within XEN Rahul Singh
2021-04-28 11:06   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-28 14:11     ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2021-04-28 14:26     ` Julien Grall
2021-04-29 11:59     ` Rahul Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=976e133f-ee94-8a2a-bc50-ebed50e2bd71@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=rahul.singh@arm.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).